Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
f_devd
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
61.
▲
by
f_devd
1y ago
I disagree, as I see it Rust's core-lib should be to interact with abstract features (intrinsics, registers, memory, borrow-checker, etc), and std-lib should be to interact with OS features (net, io, threads). Anything else is what Rus
62.
▲
by
f_devd
1y ago
let uri: Uri<HTTP> = get_uri_from_stdin().parse()?; If the library is made in a modular way this is how it would typically be done. The `HTTP` may be inferred by calls further along in the function.
63.
▲
by
f_devd
1y ago
He switched from Altium in the current version, I think the title claim is that even though KiCAD doesn't have it (yet), it can be added without external blockers because it's open source. The title doesn't match the article
64.
▲
Polonius the Crab
(docs.rs)
1 points
by
f_devd
1y ago
|
0 comments
65.
▲
by
f_devd
1y ago
Also based on Ribbon, the BuRR filters: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.01892 which seem to get very close to the theoretical optimum, 0.1%-0.5% overhead comparatively
66.
▲
by
f_devd
1y ago
No, you are correct. I misremembered with cuckoofilters.
67.
▲
by
f_devd
1y ago
> check the literature for various alternatives that are better in specific situations For direct replacements, see Xor(+)-Filters: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.08258 and the subsequent evolution into Binary Fuse Filt
68.
▲
by
f_devd
1y ago
Just to let you know, the name conflicts with Matrix TSL's Flowcode[0], which is for simpler embedded programming. [0]: https://www.flowcode.co.uk
69.
▲
by
f_devd
1y ago
Copenhagen Atomics claims to have solved 1 [0], I believe point 2 is mentioned but not in detail. [0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjHH8Qf3aO4
70.
▲
by
f_devd
1y ago
By your own calculation EROI of Battery buses should be about 15-30 (taking diesel EROI as given as it has no source) if you actually apply the vehicle's efficiency; ~85% efficiency for E2E diesel-generator-to-EV. While diesel bus woul
71.
▲
by
f_devd
1y ago
> runs software in a verifiable way (in particular, for every message you get from a dapp on the ICP, you get a certificate that proves that the majority of nodes in the subnet agree on the result). There is no need for this though, by i
72.
▲
by
f_devd
1y ago
...Until you find yourself having to workaround legacy code to support some weird target that does still use BE. Speaking from experience (tbf usually lower level than anything actually networked, more like RS485 and friends).
73.
▲
by
f_devd
1y ago
Seems way overkill & unnecessary. Wouldn't the e.V. (foundation) especially with FOSS backend/frontend already ensure continued operation? Also if it's about redudancy/resilience it seems like good ol' torrent&#
74.
▲
by
f_devd
1y ago
Maybe something to bring up to one of these e.V.'s if it ends up being difficult to get started: Codeberg.org, nlnet.nl, ccc.de
75.
▲
by
f_devd
1y ago
Potentially the pixels are being driven stronger than spec'ed (or the spec is too agressive also possible), OLEDs typically have that issue but can last longer with a lower max power.
76.
▲
by
f_devd
1y ago
True, genetic algorithms are only implied, but those implied gradients are used in the more successful evolutionary strategies. So while they might not look like it (because it's not used in a continuous descent) they still very much w
77.
▲
by
f_devd
1y ago
I mean the only claim is no propagation, you always need a gradient of sorts to update parameters. Unless you just stumble upon the desired parameters. Even genetic algorithms effectively has gradients which are obfuscated through random pr
78.
▲
by
f_devd
1y ago
If the last few years should have showed anything it's how little the elected officials typically care about balancing, let alone create excess, budget.
79.
▲
by
f_devd
2y ago
> At the same time, neither QUIC nor HTTP/3 are included in the standard libraries of any major languages including Node.js, Go, Rust, Python or Ruby. I'm not sure why it would be in the Rust std, Rust std doesn't even hav
80.
▲
by
f_devd
2y ago
That's surprising to me since they have one of the best average air quality scores of any country (that's avaiable with gmaps).
81.
▲
by
f_devd
2y ago
What is this a reference to? I'm guessing an rlib was required without them considering ABI stablility, but I can't figure out the rest.
82.
▲
by
f_devd
2y ago
True, it's not as cheap but significantly faster with the same approx power usage
83.
▲
by
f_devd
2y ago
We use fanless creditcard-sized N100 from upboard without issues although we haven't done undervolting yet.
84.
▲
by
f_devd
2y ago
I have no illusions on LLMs, I have been working with them since og BERT, always with these same issues and more. I'm just stating what would be needed in the future to make them reliably useful outside of creative writing & (human
85.
▲
by
f_devd
2y ago
Ideally yes, LLMs are tools that we expect to work, people are inherently fallible and (even unintentionally) deceptive. LLMs being human-like in this specific way is not desirable.
86.
▲
by
f_devd
2y ago
As long as you can position yourself behind the phase-shifters and the frequency is high enough (usually > 10GHz) it should be fairly easy to do.
87.
▲
by
f_devd
2y ago
UMAP: https://umap-learn.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ scikit-learn also has options: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/auto_examples/manifold/plot_...
88.
▲
by
f_devd
2y ago
For a moment I was excited that they had done surveys entirely on RF backscattering and ML.
89.
▲
by
f_devd
2y ago
It has been more formally studied in signSGD[0], and empirically it's comparable to Adam in terms of behavior. [0]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.04434
90.
▲
by
f_devd
2y ago
That's just the state calculation which would be O(N) and O(1) respectively. The based paper is saying if you made Transformers recurrent you would have a state size of 2Nd -> O(N), while based has a state size of d*d' -> O(
More ›