dustingetz

9 ms·

31.
Why We Built ExoQuery(exoquery.com)
1 points by dustingetz 10mo ago|0 comments
32.
by dustingetz 10mo ago
i don’t get it either - bun being the foundation of tons of AI tools is like a best possible outcome, what were they hoping for when they raised the money? Or is this just an admission of “hey, that was silly, we need to land this however w
33.
by dustingetz 10mo ago
companies are already wasting majority fractions of their engineering labor spend on coordination costs and fake work, through that lens i have trouble making an argument that any of this matters. Which is why they are able to do it. I’m re
34.
by dustingetz 10mo ago
are you happy with ClojureScript?
35.
by dustingetz 10mo ago
we get paid to add to it, we don’t get paid to take away
36.
by dustingetz 10mo ago
sounds fake, founders these days make up all sorts of edgy stories to PG signal to investors
37.
by dustingetz 10mo ago
he did not, flagged
38.
Bloom Institute of Technology(bloomtech.com)
1 points by dustingetz 10mo ago|0 comments
39.
by dustingetz 11mo ago
zoom call ask them to walk you through it ask for design doc if appropriate what is test plan who is responsible for prod delivery and support (no difference from any other large pr)
40.
by dustingetz 11mo ago
what do you use now
41.
by dustingetz 11mo ago
what went wrong historically that the writing got so bad these days?
42.
by dustingetz 11mo ago
when the bottleneck is communication (coordination costs scale polynomial with number of nodes in the graph), the optimal strategy is to have fewer nodes working harder. If AI makes individual nodes more effective, then in terms of people w
43.
by dustingetz 11mo ago
what does it mean to “generate thoughts”, exactly?
44.
by dustingetz 11mo ago
the OO/FP fusion hypothesis resulted in a complicated language on the OO side (too complicated for enterprise application layer) and on the FP side an autistic culture war at the seam between FP frameworks. Functional Scala remains wor
45.
by dustingetz 1y ago
companies outside the venture ecosystem need a lot more help. This is because they’re a lot harder to help. So, expect a Serenity Prayer situation. There is much less you can change. In return, you’re allowed to be older than 35. I would no
46.
by dustingetz 1y ago
this is the actual driver for AI
47.
by dustingetz 1y ago
in which year was the Notion base product smooth? 2022 after buying a Mac Studio?
48.
by dustingetz 1y ago
also, AI
49.
by dustingetz 1y ago
$25/mo no demo
50.
Founder as Prophet, Founder as Priest(jeffhuber.substack.com)
2 points by dustingetz 1y ago|0 comments
51.
by dustingetz 1y ago
saas subscriptions is the new gym memberships
52.
by dustingetz 1y ago
yes but to validate it you need dynamic runtime logic and therefore a live server with all the I/O glue code that entails. i.e., static types alone cannot render your tax forms
53.
by dustingetz 1y ago
so the feature does make sense, it’s just the implementation crosses a Conway’s law boundary (I also want this feature, to drive DOM mutations from an effect system)
54.
by dustingetz 1y ago
they seem to mean on the backend
55.
How to Communicate When Trust Is Low (Without Digging Yourself into a Hole)(charity.wtf)
3 points by dustingetz 1y ago|0 comments
56.
by dustingetz 1y ago
i think you’re looking for the term “computational structure”, as in, “what is the computational structure of a user interface” i.e. what typeclasses does the computation reify. To avoid impedance mismatches the authoring notation must alig
57.
by dustingetz 1y ago
the request/response command/query nature of the REPL is what I am referring to. Great fit for RPC-oriented web backends backed by OLTP databases that start fresh each time and run to completion. Live scene editing seems closer in
58.
by dustingetz 1y ago
the Arcadia team spent several years on this hypothesis, I am not sure the idea of a Clojure REPL for gamedev is free of impedance mismatches
59.
by dustingetz 1y ago
endorse this watch for developing leaders
60.
by dustingetz 1y ago
legacy code generating lots of revenue will continue to pay well, there will continue to be low accountability to outcomes, managers will still make more money than individual contributors

More ›