Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
djaro
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
djaro
3mo ago
Yeah, I think a lot of people on Hackernews fall into the "advertising never worked on me" or "I'm too smart for propaganda" camp. Clickbait is not just big red arrows and "OMG" in the title. It certainly
32.
▲
by
djaro
3mo ago
Well, do you want a platform people watch videos on, or a platform people simply upload videos to, never to be seen?
33.
▲
by
djaro
3mo ago
This is just a great example of people who aren't in content creation fundamentally not understanding the ecosystem. This isn't about "over-produced thumbnail-bait". This is about all high-quality media. You mention Rick
34.
▲
by
djaro
3mo ago
It's not about people "trying to make money", it's about viewers wanting to see high quality videos. High quality videos just cost a lot of money and labor to produce. There is simply no way around this. Any platform whi
35.
▲
by
djaro
3mo ago
The problem is that big creators have many subscribers, because they're the only ones making videos people want to watch. If a channel has 100 subscribers - (except if it's a brand new channel) - it's because people saw the v
36.
▲
by
djaro
3mo ago
The problem is that all of those accounts that don't earn money don't earn money because they get no views, because they make videos no one wants to watch. I don't know the exact statistics but a simple Google search says tha
37.
▲
by
djaro
3mo ago
About as likely as opening a grocery store where people can pay through voluntary donations. I'm a professional YouTuber. The problem with a "donation" system is that, unlike something like tweets or even blog posts which are
38.
▲
by
djaro
3mo ago
As a professional YouTuber, the main issue I instantly see with this is the lack of monetization. I think people who don't make videos for a living severely underestimate how expensive it is to produce high-quality videos people want t
39.
▲
by
djaro
3mo ago
The problem is that not all parents are "concerned parents" and children dont deserve to be taken advantage of by trillion dollar corporations for the crime of having bad parents.
40.
▲
by
djaro
3mo ago
Some writers like Martial were pretty much writing mildly entertaining commentary, not much different to social media now.
41.
▲
by
djaro
3mo ago
Its not a war because children arent combatants. It's instead a one sided slaughter where Meta and Google are destroying the minds of a whole generation of children who cannot and cannot be expected to defend themselves against the cla
42.
▲
by
djaro
3mo ago
As far as I can tell .gov.nl is only used for pages aimed at i.e. expats and businesses. Most services dutch people use simply have a .nl page like the digital id or filing taxes.
43.
▲
by
djaro
3mo ago
It exists, but the vast majority of government services dont use it (i.e. taxes are just done through belastingdienst.nl).
44.
▲
by
djaro
3mo ago
I think theres some real use cases in the household department. I would love an AI that I just tell my nutrition goals (I want to eat X calories, Y protein, Z fiber, hit all vitamins) and it just generates a full meal plan for me each day.
45.
▲
by
djaro
3mo ago
Yes, as a society we can collectively decide what companies should and shouldn't do. It's called living in a society with rules and regulations. > Every single games company faced with this issue is now going to change the term
46.
▲
by
djaro
3mo ago
All of these freedoms would only kick in after the developer shuts down official servers, after which the product is discontinued and not generating income anyway. It wouldn't affect game developers at all, the only change would be tha
47.
▲
by
djaro
3mo ago
Games in general are a very difficult thing to preserve because of how they are often "on-going" things rather than definitive objects like books or films. Minecraft has gone through 27 major version updates, most of which having
48.
▲
by
djaro
4mo ago
Yes, because children deserve to simultaneously not be under constant surveillance by their parents but still be protected from bad actors. Hence we should collectively, as a society, protect them.
49.
▲
by
djaro
4mo ago
Not all children have active parents. I do not believe those children deserve to be taken advantage of or hurt simply because they happen to have bad parents. The "laziness" argument doesnt work if the people being lazy (parents)
50.
▲
by
djaro
4mo ago
Also, if the government arrests you for making a post, the issue is them arresting you, not your post not being anonymous. Like, criticizing the government shouldnt just be possible because you can hide behind a fake name. It should be lega
51.
▲
by
djaro
4mo ago
Because many children will have parents that arent responsible and that doesnt mean they deserve to be taken advantage of by a billion dollar corporation.
52.
▲
by
djaro
4mo ago
This is famously why ID checks at the liquor store led to the government eventually requiring a mandatory ID check anytime you walk the dog or go to the beach... except none of that happened.
53.
▲
by
djaro
4mo ago
I mean, even if more things on the internet get restriced it wouldnt affect me since Im not a minor.
54.
▲
by
djaro
4mo ago
> Has it occurred to you that nobody cares, or should care, about your opinions about what other people and other people's kids do? Uhmm... Yes they do? That's... the whole point of living in a society? With laws? So we can col
55.
▲
by
djaro
4mo ago
The problem is many parents will not do that. Do those children then deserve to be taken advantage of by social media corporations? Generally, things that are harmful and addictive such as alcohol, cigarettes and casinos require age verific
56.
▲
by
djaro
4mo ago
Age verification has always existed in the physical world, such as at bars and casinos. I just dont see why the internet should be immune to real world rules we decided upon for good reason.
57.
▲
by
djaro
4mo ago
Some scalpers will move to the black market. Most will quit. People dont want to go to jail.
58.
▲
by
djaro
5mo ago
There is such a thing as general intelligence which differs between different people. Arguing that IQ isn't real because IQ tests are imperfect, is like arguing in the year 1500 that temperature isn't real because all thermometers
59.
▲
by
djaro
5mo ago
This still can't show that my red is your red, only that my red is on the same position of my color wheel as your red is on yours
60.
▲
by
djaro
5mo ago
But its frequency still rose by over 300x since the start of the chart, which might suggest that for some people it is a basic color term. "English" isn't one monolith. Every English speaker speaks their own version, some clo
More ›