devnull3

7 ms·

61.
by devnull3 1y ago
To be fair, if we know something will happen with high certainty then its not much of a prediction. The fact that no one really knows how LLMS will pan-out means every projection in future is a prediction.
62.
by devnull3 1y ago
It will still be much lesser than perma Cambrian explosion in js frameworks. Infact, a lot of the patterns in the likes of HTMX will be standardised.
63.
by devnull3 1y ago
On thing about datastar vs htmx: Datastar embraces htmx's OOB swap and makes it a first class concept. HTMX's OOB swap appears to be an after thought.
64.
by devnull3 1y ago
I don't know V but mostly what I have read about V is that it is vaporware [1]. Is there truth to this impression? [1] https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&channel=ent...
65.
by devnull3 2y ago
mentioned in the article at [1] [1] https://thephd.dev/c2y-the-defer-technical-specification-its...
66.
Geoff Keighley attempts to trademark "The Game Awards"(thatparkplace.com)
1 points by devnull3 2y ago|0 comments
67.
by devnull3 2y ago
New and non-plagiarized text is essential for all the AI models to train on. Without these the AI models will reach the saturation point or worse the output will not be as effective as it can be. If AI trains on generated text it is equival
68.
by devnull3 2y ago
This assertion needs a lawsuit and deep pockets. Most startups will not be able to do this. Infact the patent holder can file a lawsuit against a startup. Now even if the startup can prove that the patent is invalid, it has to spend preciou
69.
by devnull3 2y ago
Having filed multiple patents, it does not leave a good taste in your mouth (esp software patents). You know you are bullshitting but unfortunately it needs to be done because others will do it and deny you to use the invention.
70.
by devnull3 2y ago
> Does this mean if I disclose an invention, that nobody can patent it after a year? Others can. But during their application who is going to tell that there is a prior art? Patent offices only do basic checks on existing patents and not
71.
by devnull3 2y ago
On the other hand its published on open-std.org which adds to its credibility
72.
by devnull3 2y ago
This appears to be a out of season April Fool's joke. Am I the only one who thinks the this sacrifices the readability?
73.
by devnull3 2y ago
Highly doubt it. It is increasingly becoming difficult to get (or renew) H1B visa.
74.
by devnull3 2y ago
The less said about Gandhi the better. He had an amazing PR in the age when there was no concept of PR. The world has always been divide on: Owners and workers. This transcends communism and capitalism. Owners always wants more work out of
75.
by devnull3 2y ago
At a coarser level it works in India, but not at granular level. If you are involved in a lawsuit then it can drag for years. So essentially it becomes "justice delayed is justice denied".
76.
by devnull3 2y ago
There are 2 types of companies in India at present: 1. Services 2. Products The product companies's culture and environment are on-par with silicon valley and this includes a good pay as well. Services is another matter. The fundamenta
77.
by devnull3 2y ago
Not a law per-se but I am not aware of any firm which allows dual employment. Moonlighting is not allowed and is mentioned in the employment contract. Hence the "leaving certificate" serves multiple purpose: 1. Person is not worki
78.
by devnull3 2y ago
In India your new employer demands "leaving certificate". This is an official letter from previous letter that you are no longer employed with them. An existing employer can weaponize this and simply not issue this letter. This do
79.
by devnull3 2y ago
> my product should find problems in 3rd party components. Does that mean that say a security vulnerability in openssl is a responsibility of all software which uses them? I think its unreasonable to expect software projects/product
80.
by devnull3 2y ago
Who decides the definition of "what was suppose to work" in the context of a given software product? There are times when a feature is used in a way which was not intended by the developers. Now do the developers have to publish t
81.
by devnull3 2y ago
Few points about India 1. Anyone claiming to know India well is either foolish or lying? (This includes Indians). India is diverse on all counts imaginable (color, language, wealth, urbanization, etc). Every permutation will throw up large
82.
by devnull3 2y ago
I think the main attraction of object storage like S3 is that it already solves the hard problems (distributed-ness, scalability, durability, etc) with a simple(r) API. Also, apis like S3 are defacto standard with many vendors supporting a
83.
by devnull3 2y ago
I stand corrected! Thanks!
84.
by devnull3 2y ago
Agree but my point is when you see a new and better rival then instead of pivoting SF became even worse and became malware-ised. Also SF was based on SVN. They failed to understand and capitalize on a better tech on the market i.e. git.
85.
by devnull3 2y ago
The rise of github also coincided with enshitification of sourceforge.net. SF although was not git based at that time but it had the mindshare of lot of open source projects and it went complete downhill. So, a downfall of a potential alter
86.
by devnull3 2y ago
It is/was an April Fool's joke
87.
by devnull3 2y ago
In the beginning, I was trying to use Rust like C (which I think lot of people do) and was struggling with the borrow checker. I had a light bulb in my head one day to read the function signature and see if its '&self' or &#x2
88.
by devnull3 2y ago
Under pressure, I suggested the following: 1. Only one solution (or path in this case) should exist 2. No loops (meaning the valid solution does not cross it-self) 3. The length of false path from correct path should not be more than 4
89.
by devnull3 2y ago
Maze(s) triggers PTSD in me. I was asked to write a code to generate one using a 100x100 grid in an Google interview in 40 min such that it was "fair". It was for L6/L7 (IC) position. I wrote a working code and the interviewe
90.
by devnull3 2y ago
How is this priced? Is it Get + Put or only Put?

More ›