dev360

6 ms·

181.
by dev360 12y ago
Sorry if I'm harsh, but I think this is a terrible way to choose a programming language. It is suggesting a one size fits all approach, and I'm kind of disappointed to see a lot of languages thrown out without objective scrutiny.
182.
by dev360 12y ago
Yes this might be true right now, but take a look at a lot of the tech startups are cropping up - humor yourself and look up a list of the tech ipos the last two years. They are overwhelmingly based on open source technology and they are al
183.
by dev360 12y ago
Have you been able to find any of it in the internet archive?
184.
by dev360 12y ago
Maybe you can explain something that puzzles me - why is (1 / 0) * (1 / (1 / 0)) equal to NaN? Edit: just checked and haskell behaves the same way.
185.
by dev360 12y ago
Sure you can, but the technology of the future is not being built or run on windows stacks. You find it everywhere in the enterprise, yet almost every big new tech company that has come up in the last 10 years all rely primarily on open sou
186.
by dev360 12y ago
Yes. Most users of .NET is in the enterprise (as opposed to tech and startups) and Java has positioned itself as the go-to platform for big data analytics and processing. I think this comes down to clinging to an antiquated product model. A
187.
by dev360 12y ago
I say that a lot and I feel like .NET is loosing relevance. Embracing open source and making Linux a first-class citizen in the eco system would be the only way for .NET to increase adoption or stay technologically relevant, and unfortunate
188.
by dev360 12y ago
Is this admission that codeplex is dead?
189.
by dev360 12y ago
This has happened to me a lot too. A lot of times there will be tons of politics involved and for whatever reason somebody (a team or project lead) may want to portray 'their' version of the narrative mostly for political reasons.
190.
by dev360 12y ago
I used to be in 'Enterprise' development and I have noticed that a lot of people I knew who were doing PM work have now jumped onto the Agile bandwagon.
191.
by dev360 12y ago
This was a great read. I find this approach to be the path of least resistance with languages like C#, but for Python or Ruby, I always find myself using a mock framework. That overhead in structure (classes, interfaces etc.) feels like it
192.
by dev360 12y ago
Crush all opposition, just like Stevie would have done!
193.
Gramofon, a Sonos contender?(businessinsider.com)
1 points by dev360 12y ago|0 comments
194.
by dev360 12y ago
Yes, it sounds like its a websocket server. A lot of that stuff is relatively low complexity if you glue everything together with a message queue since they can be made language agnostic very easily.
195.
by dev360 12y ago
This doesn't feel like a genuine analysis of SRP. The OP asks "but why should a class have one single Reason To Change™?" Answer is in the text - "If a class has more than one responsibility, then the responsibilities be
196.
by dev360 12y ago
Interesting - I've had a lot of back and forths with a friend of mine with this.. I'd strum a Gmaj and hed insist its out of tune.
197.
by dev360 12y ago
Or like having an aspbergers stalker?
198.
by dev360 12y ago
Conceptually, theres a lot of stuff thats similar. I found Erlangs syntax to be a little unconventional so it depends on your background. If you just want to learn a FP language, I'd go with Haskell because you learn a pure FP language
199.
by dev360 12y ago
Reading the Learn you a haskell book and digesting it really slowly was the way to go for me personally. I saw a lot of parallels with things I love in Python and that drew me in.
200.
by dev360 12y ago
Ahhh MAN! This same thing with the bracelet breaking happened to my Fitbit Flex - I'm freaking furious!
201.
by dev360 12y ago
Mocks to me represent a different approach to testing - think London School of Testing vs Classic TDD. With Classic TDD, it can be difficult to test side effects in your code since its more focused on input and output.
202.
by dev360 12y ago
Ah! An un-brainwashing from no other than Rails brainwasher in chief! Rails has always had this fundamentalist/cult/group-think perspective on almost everything. No wonder they go overboard.
203.
by dev360 12y ago
It feels like nobody is addressing WHY angular uses DI/IoC.. In something like Java or .NET, you use it to a large extent because it separates code nicely and makes it easier to test. In JS, one big problems is that you want your code
204.
by dev360 12y ago
You shouldn't take offense. If you work on large complicated Java/C# projects, by all means, bake in as many GoF patterns you can muster. Part of what the OP is hinting at is that in a lot of other languages, there is simply no pl
205.
by dev360 12y ago
The python drivers never made it safe by default.
206.
by dev360 12y ago
I found it to really suck with horizontal scalability and high performance. We are paying 3k per month for mongo hosting because its such a pain to manage and it performs so poorly at just 150gb of data that we need 3 shards which I find in
207.
by dev360 12y ago
Most full stack frameworks have a way to create migrations. When the schema changes over time, you just get a mess with mongo, thats just my observation. Its far easier to manage change with db migrations.
208.
by dev360 13y ago
Why should anyone bother with .net if Microsoft can't make a wholehearted commitment to have it run on all platforms?
209.
by dev360 13y ago
What language do you program in?
210.
by dev360 13y ago
Screw Frontpage, it littered your markup when you went into design mode. Hotdog Pro or Coffee Cup Editor was where it was at!

More ›