d110af5ccf

6 ms·

31.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
Well when you put it that way, we have lots of regulations surrounding gambling for precisely the reason that a significant fraction of people hopelessly "fall for it".
32.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
> > or otherwise uses my hardware against me > Proving the current state of your system isn't using your hardware against you. It is showing that your system is secure against cheats. Complete doublespeak. It is using your har
33.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
> There is no other evidence of any sort that LLMs may be intelligent Other than all the downright uncanny output. Personally I doubt current LLMs are sufficient for sentience but that's purely a hunch on my part. Many people such a
34.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
> Are you saying that the OP's brain is doing "something that couldn't be done with "matrix multiplications", or are you saying it isn't doing something like that? He is saying neither. He is observing that
35.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
Those checks are then performed on the MITM device. Instead of an error page the device could return the same sort of page that your browser would otherwise display for you. The connection has been MITM'd after all.
36.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
> You can't control it as a network administrator Yes you can. Do what corporate firewalls do. MITM all TLS connections with your own personal CA. Don't allow any traffic streams that you can't MITM to leave your network.
37.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
> They don't actually understand what these concepts mean. You say this so confidently. But can you define in terms that are directly quantifiable what "understanding a concept" actually means? I don't believe that an
38.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
> that I've always found delightful Leaking user data to me is a betrayal of trust, incredibly distasteful, and probably borders on illegal (it ought to be imo). Note that this is fundamentally different than watermarking streaming
39.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
I was wondering about this as well. What exact mechanism did they use to detect the read? Something like mprotect would only trigger for the game process, not another process that snooped the game's memory remotely. I wonder if the che
40.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
That won't work against ML bots that take video input which is increasingly going to be a problem. I also will never knowingly permit a program to run on my computer that performs remote attestation or otherwise uses my hardware agains
41.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
This is disingenuous. I've been exposed to alternative viewpoints, saw what I consider obvious holes, and either expressed disagreement or disregarded them entirely. If someone can convincingly (from my perspective, not theirs) illustr
42.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
This is a very interesting perspective but I don't think it's an argument in favor of censorship. Rather I think it's an objection to the way in which current social media "spaces" are "laid out" in a func
43.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
It does include the right to access the public square though. And if a particular free platform has become a public square by virtue of size then I think it does include the right to access that platform. Such platforms should probably not
44.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
> at trusted channels The public square is not in and of itself a trusted channel so I doubt you are talking about the same thing as the person you responded to.
45.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
Not really, no. All three cases (US Gov, Turkish Gov, Elon) are censorship of the public square in the end. I'm against all of them. As far as I'm concerned the US constitutional standard for free speech should apply to any platfo
46.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
> fraud speech This is you fundamentally misunderstanding what is meant by "speech". The statement itself is not illegal. The act of misrepresenting the transaction being agreed to is what's illegal. A specific act that in
47.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
That depends entirely on who does it. An individual versus a government official. The overarching point still stands. That people being in favor of censoring "disinformation" (ie speech by private individuals) in certain instances
48.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
> If you're using a layout that defines AltGr Which the parent was pointing out is nonstandard. There is no alt-gr key on a standard US keyboard. You can certainly remap alt-right to alt-gr but that is nonstandard and doing so does
49.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
> if you don't use your budget by xyz date, you lose it It doesn't apply to cash or my bank account. I do not want that to change. I will not support a tool that would enable this. > Food stamps can only be spent on food Tho
50.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
It's the obvious logical conclusion. Much of Europe is already actively trying to eliminate cash for quite a few years now. So the notion that a CBDC is acceptable specifically because cash will still exist, and that people won't
51.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
> this isn't some new feature. If the government orders you assets frozen/seized, then a bank is going to comply with the order You aren't seriously trying to imply that it would be feasible for a government to decide to
52.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
you can "barter" with something like XMR though. that seems to be even lower friction than physical cash in some ways
53.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
> it seems that this merely exposes the normal operation. Insufficient images of that person prevented it from abstracting the person components from the background yes my point was that this total failure to abstract (or slice or averag
54.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
to me the "search engine" case where it reproduces a specific training image seems like a failure mode that's distinct from normal operation > it is assembling those from averages of the components found it's training
55.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
> humans are necessary cogs for now > If you consider the risk of EMP if you consider the risk of a bioweapon ...
56.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
Why is the government involved in this, again?
57.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
Realistically (not legally) you can continue for personal use. Good luck commercializing though. Even if you published the work previously you'd most likely have an expensive legal battle ahead of you.
58.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
This has already been happening (custom voice models of a target the purpose of fraud) for (at least) the past couple of years. It just keeps getting easier and more efficient.
59.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
I wonder if your example might actually be enough to render it unenforceable if you documented it.
60.
by d110af5ccf 4y ago
It disappoints me that americans are seemingly so ambivalent to this particular government overreach. The same thing appears to be playing out with drones now as well.

More ›