Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
cupofpython
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
>we have spent time looking into other game engines besides our own to see if we could move faster on established products while minimizing risk, but the landscape is amazingly poor. i hadnt done a real deep dive yet, but from introducto
32.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
Could you give me some advice on a related problem I have? I want to make a "game" which is more of a game environment sandbox. something kind of in-between game engines and actual games. I want to be able to create the feel of
33.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
nice, very cool then
34.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
did they come up with their structures independently of the x-ray crystallography, or was that part of a ML dataset for predicting structure
35.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
does FAANG employ generalists on a ladder? I feel like they would just hire a consulting group instead
36.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
>the latter tend to expect a higher salary due to their accumulated experience. i was thinking people who are probably capable of retiring, but still want to work a job with more soft perks than pay. but yeah, maybe the work doesnt real
37.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
IME from doing general work at 3 companies in different industries (which might not be fully representative): Also sorry, turns out i ended up venting >someone has to do it, and if the pay is adequate, it's a matter of attitude. th
38.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
> you have to make big decisions early on about what you're most interested in and then pursue a deep specialization in it I am seeing similar trends to you wrt Generalists, and this is annoying but good advice. Even when hired, gen
39.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
I understand that frustration, but there are layers to benefit of the doubt. Sometimes giving BotD involves changing the conversation topic because an understanding is not going to be reached on the current one. the best way to think abo
40.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
I have inadvertently been "starman"-ing people my entire life. I usually refer to it as "benefit of the doubt". I have not encountered any problems with it in practice other than that sometimes I end up talking in circ
41.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
Oh definitely.. but a good leader could still fall into some traps of thinking they can offload some of their good leadership decisions into targets. and then employees feel judged rather than seen
42.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
>The more likely outcome if the engine is 'correct' is that it sees the line but thinks an alternative one offers a much greater advantage No I mean it literally does not see the advantage until after the move is played and it
43.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
> if downstream ops are expected to cope with, say, a deviation of 20 %, that tolerance kind of becomes the goal for the forecast accuracy. I think a forecasting target of 20% shouldnt be necessary unless you want to be around 19% deviat
44.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
In addition to this, metrics do not need targets. repeating for emphasis: metrics do not need targets. You absolutely need measurements and data, and to highlight trends.. but target metrics are almost always bullshit. It reminds me of a
45.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
probably because self-driving has fuzzy accountability and is the same driver in all vehicles. if a taxi driver crashes, youve got a bad taxi driver somewhere you will probably never interact with. If a self-driving car crashes, you've
46.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
I do like that you cannot downvote people replying to your own comment
47.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
> whenever I check the comments on a post the top comment is like "ackchyually..." I attribute this to the quality of the source material. there's a limit to how much the linked article can reasonably convey while still b
48.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
effort put into comment !~ value of comment to others
49.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
thank you, this is pretty much what I was trying to say. Especially the narratives part. there are plenty of instances of humans finding winning moves in positions that the computer did not 'see' the advantage of until after it
50.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
I think you are misunderstanding. His sentiment seems to be one of "I am burnt out and unmotivated to continue BUT the idea of playing against a young upcoming GM could be motivating enough" So it isnt the most important reason,
51.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
you're missing the point of my post. yes the computer prunes, but fundamentally it is attempting to review all possible scenarios indiscriminately as opposed to a human who is trying to make some sort of sense of the position. withou
52.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
while true, it is still fair to say Carlsen views nepo as a waste of time. While it would be easy to dismiss this as hubris - i think the bigger point is that he doesnt gain anything from beating him again. It's not that Nepo has no
53.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
there needs to be work done and intuition developed in order for a human to look any amount of moves ahead. we do not look ahead in the same way a computer algorithm does we look ahead in ways like "doing this leaves this area weak, a
54.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
i have to imagine there are only so many 'tricks'/new lines left for him to use to win games at that level. revealing them on center stage for a single win is wasteful of the resources he has. the WCC games get studied by ev
55.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
the point is that his winning position was a 64 move convert and he was correct. Lots of players believe they will end up in a winning position, but overlook something while "not bothering with the details". it's less about
56.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
>One draft of Bud Light was $12 most are probably aware of this, but a 12pack of budlight costs $12 from walmart and a 24-pack costs $19
57.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
but then you dont actually have to spend resources breaking the treaty since everyone is already assuming you did. at best it's just an "are you feeling lucky?" situation unless you publicly prove it
58.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
>I don't see why competent studios like Blizzard/BioWare/Id could not simply self-publish their games related to this is how the games are managed once installed as well. Each studio is moving towards each having their own
59.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
works with a variety of games for me. my preference historically has been competitive shooters with team communications (CSGO, Halo), strategy games (Civ5), survival games (minecraft, v rising), RPGs (elden ring, skyrim, Divinity Original
60.
▲
by
cupofpython
4y ago
the oxygen point is something ive come across elsewhere as well. could be related to people who live in higher altitudes having longer lifespans
More ›