Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
croon
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
croon
16d ago
If it is/can be used to track citizens arbitrarily regardless of crime, it is spying, regardless where the cameras are. You might be right that the issues could be solved without removing the cameras, but they definitely will be solved
32.
▲
by
croon
16d ago
I believe the first Command & Conquer was the one I played that way. But I'm young, so it can't possibly be the same, can it?
33.
▲
by
croon
16d ago
It might be mostly with kids seeking status from materialism, but blue bubbles as opposed to green bubbles was/is still a thing.
34.
▲
by
croon
19d ago
1) (all) tariffs aren't obviously and universally bad, only when applied universally without any coherent long term goal/strategy. 2) retaliatory tariffs are targeting the hostile actor, not widely against all (other) trading part
35.
▲
by
croon
20d ago
I'm unsure how you reach the conclusion of "self-interest". Unions are about collective bargaining power, reaching (ideally) what's best for most of the people it represents, even if it's detrimental to you specific
36.
▲
by
croon
22d ago
Sure, but I'm not comparing credit cards to cash, but credit card incumbents to hypothetical lower rate ones that don't offer rewards in exchange for risk and busywork.
37.
▲
by
croon
22d ago
Cashback is definitely capped, I'm less sure on other forms of rewards, but by my napkin comparisons, I do get out more "value" from my credit cards than the fees and cashback caps. YMMV of course.
38.
▲
by
croon
22d ago
While I hate that it's like this, you're leaving money on the table. Currently you're keeping money in the bank accruing the bank interest to occasionally pay for stuff. With a credit card you would get various bonuses/c
39.
▲
by
croon
22d ago
Imagine a world where the pipeline from extra fees back to hoop-hopping cashback didn't exist and your services were just cheaper by the same percentage points instead. It's designed to make money off people slipping up instead of
40.
▲
by
croon
22d ago
No; one is asking, the other is asserting. One can only end in a question mark, the other can end with a period.
41.
▲
by
croon
23d ago
That isn't the question they posed either.
42.
▲
by
croon
23d ago
That's not the scenario GP was asking for legal basis for, it was explicitly where police haven't informed you yet.
43.
▲
by
croon
23d ago
You replied to this: >> Deleting your data is absolutely a crime when you know the authorities could've wanted whatever it was you deleted -- even if they haven't told you yet. > Can you provide a statute number for this
44.
▲
by
croon
26d ago
Let's say I want to retire my laptop to my kid, so I reformat it. Are you saying in the eventuality that federal police then wants my laptop that I have committed a crime? If so, on that assumption, should no one ever be able to erase
45.
▲
by
croon
26d ago
I prefer TUIs personally, but I can't see myself use maps, or visual image editing in a TUI for example, but is vi infinitely faster than vscode for manipulating a codebase? Absolutely. Anything that lends itself to keyboard input, pip
46.
▲
by
croon
26d ago
If age of conventions is a valuable metric, TUIs have more. The keyboard hasn't change noticeably, and I can work way faster between separate windows/panes in a terminal and tmux, than in various GUI windows, where mouse focus dic
47.
▲
by
croon
27d ago
> What? This entire thread and the OP and comment I originally replied to is people saying that Ai shouldn't be used for writing... No, the entire thread is literally called "Don't Paste the AI, please". That's n
48.
▲
by
croon
27d ago
> No, you were claiming that no one has ever used Ai to help produce better writing. I was objecting to that, because it is an absurd statement. Ai could have told you that if you asked. Maybe take your own advice and ask your LLM if I d
49.
▲
by
croon
27d ago
Correct, I was treating their claim as true for the sake of argument, not accepting it.
50.
▲
by
croon
27d ago
I'm not claiming an LLM writes better than me.
51.
▲
by
croon
27d ago
> Sorry to say, but this is a skill issue (and not necessarily with using Ai). I've used Ai MANY times to help SIGNIFICANTLY improve things that I've written - from a few sentences to many paragraphs. As I've said in other
52.
▲
by
croon
27d ago
> The fundamental issue is whether people are taking responsibility to communicate what needs to be communicated, in an effective manner. While I agree with your overall distinction, I believe the scenario you portray is so unrealistic t
53.
▲
by
croon
27d ago
"Do you support nuclear power? I'm asking because I believe it's a requirement for grid stability/current battery solutions can't sustain demand during solar downtime" That is a defensible question, that can be
54.
▲
by
croon
27d ago
And yet more meaningful than that is what the debt increase is spent on. If it's infrastructure/education/etc, productivity/population welfare will rise over time. If it's debt through tax cuts, temporary productivi
55.
▲
by
croon
1mo ago
My pushback on that would be that all of the "engineering" concering a rewrite was already done the first time around. It's a glorified translation. I do agree that the port would've taken a lot longer without LLMs thoug
56.
▲
by
croon
1mo ago
I don't think there's been a single version of the major LLM providers that haven't handicapped the tech since the beginning by changing temperature/top-P/frequency penalty/etc. All of those stray from "hi
57.
▲
by
croon
1mo ago
I'd love to live in a society where people and corporations do good things for PR.
58.
▲
by
croon
1mo ago
I don't think they're merely referring to media/arts as culture. Enshittification is culture too, and it's certainly spreading.
59.
▲
by
croon
1mo ago
> You are saying that COVID is worse than infection, so tell us when you tested people with no infection so that you can say that! When did you perform that test that you keep acting like is common sense knowledge? Why don't you jus
60.
▲
by
croon
1mo ago
This is so incredibly tiresome. I quoted Dr Wu in this literal thread, the actual author of the Stanford study. You're the one disagreeing with him.
More ›