computerthings

9 ms·

301.
by computerthings 2y ago
> If I have access to all this wonderful automation tech But "you" don't, that is precisely the point. The speed at which the gap between rich and poor grows keeps increasing, after all -- the rest is commentary --, and pe
302.
by computerthings 2y ago
The claim was that "the world is not this coordinated", not that McKinsey specifically is orchestrating it all by themselves. And my response to that claim was that it doesn't even have to be "coordinated". Do you
303.
by computerthings 2y ago
Calling stuff a "conspiracy theory" is just a thought-terminating cliché, and measuring the ability of humans to conspire [0] by equating that ability with stuff like Elvis still being alive isn't the attempt of an argument,
304.
by computerthings 2y ago
I don't think of it as "needing WebGL", but as something finally utilizing it for this. Just about anything gets better if you can find a way to do it on the GPU, at least when considering hardware easily available for consum
305.
by computerthings 2y ago
As someone who makes the occasional simple JS game prototypes (I don't have ideas for "actual games" but I love to dabble) my first [0] thought was how sexy this could be as a UI for a web game, without the publishing step, j
306.
by computerthings 2y ago
> They literally said "spreading your religion" at the very start of their critique. And that critique is near the end of all the people who asked questions or made comments. So no, the presenter wasn't "immediately
307.
by computerthings 2y ago
What was literally said didn't include the words "always" or "your dumb rust code". From the subtitles with slight manual fixes: > I suspect part of the problem here is you're trying to convince everyone t
308.
by computerthings 2y ago
> AI Bubble which mixes water, air and detergent to create a cleansing foam that seeps into your fabrics -- https://soyacincau.com/2024/05/15/samsung-bespoke-ai-laundry... If you can't defeat the peop
309.
by computerthings 2y ago
update todos set pos = pos+1 where pos >= 3 ORDER BY pos DESC Am I missing something?