codeguro

6 ms·

61.
by codeguro 4y ago
That’s it, I’m reporting this to the FSF, and the copyright holders to libgcrypt and Praat. This is exactly what the GPL license was made for!
62.
by codeguro 4y ago
Now we're going in full circle, so I'll just point you to the parent thread: > One must understand that E2EE is used when you don't trust your service provider to handle your data. In other words, the adversary in your thr
63.
by codeguro 4y ago
Insulting, whether at an individual or at a group, is a lowly, immoral act in of itself despite one being slightly better than the other.
64.
by codeguro 4y ago
> by god, this is not how you build a consensus or a high functioning team I beg to differ. Linus Torvalds is an example for us all, and I’d argue he has one of the most, if not the most, highly functioning open source teams in the world
65.
by codeguro 4y ago
> Due to IP reasons, this can't ship as code, so we need to ship binaries. Good, it should be as difficult as possible, if not illegal, to ship proprietary crap to Linux. The operating system was always intended to be Free Software.
66.
by codeguro 4y ago
A well balanced breakfast, being necessary to the start of a healthy day, the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed. Who has the right to food? A well balanced breakfast or the people?
67.
by codeguro 4y ago
> For anyone who honestly feels this way, it would seem that the most obvious next step is to enact very strong laws that prevent that now-born perfectly viable human child from being murdered at school. I can respect such a consistent p
68.
by codeguro 4y ago
Name one civilization raises primates to be eaten like cattle.
69.
by codeguro 4y ago
You have some serious reading comprehension problems. He asked if it was murder, not "if it was under legal threat". And I never said it was bad. It attempts to conceive children not kill children, that's why it's silly.
70.
by codeguro 4y ago
> You define "child" based on a religious definition. That's /your/ religion, not mine. Feel free to follow it all you want, you don't need to involve the rest of us. We're not talking about children, w
71.
by codeguro 4y ago
I think both types of children should be protected. Can't you read?
72.
by codeguro 4y ago
> In fact isn’t viability one if the leading pro-choice indicators of morality in abortion? No. That's a tactical argument. The leading, fundamental argument from morality is the value of human life. That's probably why many la
73.
by codeguro 4y ago
>Plan B blocks fertilization. It can also block implantation. From the FDA: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information... I don't personally hold strong opinions on Plan B. I think it should b
74.
by codeguro 4y ago
Name one civilization raises primates to be eaten like cattle.
75.
by codeguro 4y ago
> One of the legislative initiatives that has been undertaken by several states is a statute creating a trigger ban on abortion, wherein the Supreme Court striking down Roe would immediately result in an automatic complete abortion ban s
76.
by codeguro 4y ago
> Is IVF murder of children? Is a twin that consumed a twin in-utero a killer? Should we launch a criminal investigation every time a woman has a miscarriage? (1) That's a silly question. In-virtro fertilization is a series of proce
77.
by codeguro 4y ago
It’s completely uneffective.
78.
by codeguro 4y ago
It doesn’t. You cannot legislate math. You cannot change the laws of physics either. These so called “laws” will do absolutely nothing to stop or even deter an committed criminal from so much as sharing child porn. It’s completely unenforce
79.
by codeguro 4y ago
> Oh, since we can't have them benefiting from positive outcomes of collective action, we'll pipe in polluted air and river waste to help simulate a truly free market environmental policy. That’s a completely artificial and sho
80.
by codeguro 4y ago
Get a firearm and train with it. Your government prevents you from defending yourself effectively.
81.
by codeguro 4y ago
You don't get to unilaterally decide what qualifies as market rate.
82.
by codeguro 4y ago
> you can't be seriously arguing that any increase will force all unskilled labour into unemployment Why not? If Peter's labor is only worth $X but minimum wage is raised to $X+5, a company can reasonably be expected to fire Pe
83.
by codeguro 4y ago
The economist I'm quoting is Milton Friedman. Who are your economists, I wonder? Some liberal who wants to use the force of government to impose their will on small businesses so they can act virtuous to get votes?
84.
by codeguro 4y ago
I fundamentally disagree with your premise. Your rhetoric mimics that of a socialist. I'll tear apart your philosophical rhetoric one part at a time. > human life and human labor has intrinsic value and any company's bill of ma
85.
by codeguro 4y ago
Yeah, I'm sure that not following the building codes in the state of Florida is financially beneficial to Disney. > Not sure where that idea comes from, but Disney absolutely pays taxes and your claim is false. It is absolutely true
86.
by codeguro 4y ago
You are very disingenuous. It's not a "Don't say gay" bill, it's a "Parental Rights in Education" bill. The idea that Disney Corp and its employees have special tax exemptions that is enjoyed by nobody els
87.
by codeguro 4y ago
The Florida State Legislatures and the Florida Executive Administrators disagree, which is why they are removing their special tax exemption status. Disney should not and cannot influence Florida's policies when they (and their employe
88.
by codeguro 4y ago
That's an abhorrent lie. Their independent tax district is absolutely a sweetheart deal. The ability to privately govern the land that it owns (i.e. not pay state/property taxes) outright flies in the face of the first clause in 1
89.
by codeguro 4y ago
The Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1 - equality under the law. Why should disney be exempt from property taxes? From state taxes? What gives Disney Corp the right to influence the policies of Florida whey they do not subject themselves to th
90.
by codeguro 4y ago
The idea that a corporate entity gets to have a say, politically speaking, when they don't even pay taxes is abhorrent. Equality looks like oppression to those who are privileged. And make no mistake, Disney is privileged; they don&#x2

More ›