Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
avaer
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
avaer
13d ago
You could script this in with a time database, illustrations, and appropriate harness, tests, and editing passes. It's a massive problem with human authors too, which is why they do a lot of lorekeeping and editing, so the AI should be
32.
▲
by
avaer
13d ago
I would trust 4chan more than I trust Twitter aura farming.
33.
▲
by
avaer
13d ago
What I'm suggesting is if you want a certain semantic part of the scene to have a specific design or fidelity (say an interactive object, point of interest, character, or parts thereof), you can generate it via image and then use princ
34.
▲
by
avaer
14d ago
> Opus 5 is just as good for this tbh and cheaper. It depends on the fidelity, there's a threshold slightly over "low poly" that Opus cannot get over. Once you get into creating foliage l-systems, or physical mob animation
35.
▲
by
avaer
16d ago
One interesting formulation is that humans are the sex organs of AI.
36.
▲
by
avaer
16d ago
Analog AI/approximate computing? There's research into it, worth looking at if you're interested. The idea is you tolerate some loss/degradation (which neural networks do) but gain orders of magnitude power efficiency.
37.
▲
by
avaer
16d ago
> $40k is a _very_ generous prize for a short piece of writing Exactly. Not sure it will stop the inevitable torrent of slop, but it's generous enough that I think enough serious people will take it seriously that something interest
38.
▲
by
avaer
16d ago
Also gwern and Matt Huang. Seems a pretty interesting committee. And 40K is enough for this to be taken seriously for producing 1000-5000 words.
39.
▲
by
avaer
17d ago
Ontario is an aboriginal name for the lake, which the province pays homage to. All of this is silly, but with this pattern it makes more sense to change the name of New York than to call it Lake New York.
40.
▲
by
avaer
20d ago
That's why the exploit of a social media savvy government is to overflow the system with so much slop (literally and figuratively) the law can never catch up. Your bug is their feature.
41.
▲
by
avaer
21d ago
That doesn't seem ironic at all. It would be ironic if "Anarchy!" had an HQ.
42.
▲
by
avaer
22d ago
> How to use Gemini for a college essay Given that this is increasingly the go-to for a college degree, college needs to rethink its cirricula and place in the world. Or at least get rid of the essay. Lest it become a place where student
43.
▲
by
avaer
22d ago
Most people on HN don't work at Google. And most would probably agree that both Google and Twitter are being user-hostile.
44.
▲
by
avaer
27d ago
I don't think it's particularly difficult, or clever. You can prompt your way into this with frontier models, especially if your codebase is designed for it from the ground up (architecture well factored, documented, tested, harne
45.
▲
by
avaer
27d ago
I think the reverse direction is more important: taking a massive complex problem/codebase and decomposing it to short pseudocode. Then you could edit the pseudocode and compile it back into the system. That's the way software eng
46.
▲
by
avaer
29d ago
If nobody owns the code and everyone has the same rights to it (per the parent) the person copying the code would have the same right to claim they wrote it. And there are definitely people who will do this when there is money and reputatio
47.
▲
by
avaer
29d ago
I'm not arguing against open source, I'm just trying to point out the downstream effects of an absolutist stance on it.
48.
▲
by
avaer
29d ago
Hypothetical but serious question on your stance: if someone takes "your" code, claims authorship, sells access, and becomes a billionaire from it while you get accused of plagiarizing "their" code and can't get a j
49.
▲
by
avaer
29d ago
Yup. But that's 10x more complicated, and needs an even more specialized baking phase that's even further from the raw representation. It only multiplies the issue. And Nanite is not really designed for the kinds of lower fideli
50.
▲
by
avaer
29d ago
My ideal would be the model generates the sources (so it's programmatically tweakable after the fact, which is the entire appeal), but there is an open source compilation tool or something that can optimize it for the different use cas
51.
▲
by
avaer
29d ago
> Agents playtest my games overnight I'm curious if you want to elaborate. What kind of games? Turn based? Do you just feed it repeated screenshots? 3D ARPG with dozens of systems, think Genshin or Fortnite. But it's all typesc
52.
▲
by
avaer
29d ago
Have you explored optimizing the assets to be game-ready? This kind of decomposition works if you have a single object on screen, and it's super artist + programmer friendly. But the generated assets have ~50 mesh parts, which means im
53.
▲
by
avaer
29d ago
I am doubtful about the timeline. Not because AI can't do it; it totally can. LLMs have been able to run the full artist + code pipeline at least since the beginning of the year. I've built several physics-synced network simulatio
54.
▲
by
avaer
1mo ago
Sama saw this coming a decade away, which is why he invested in Worldcoin (now World). At some point people (and agents) will be clamoring for human verification at the speed of technology. I'm not a fan of World, but this is a portent
55.
▲
by
avaer
1mo ago
That's missing the point. It's the distribution that's the "best", not the tokens. Then Anthropic comes in and makes the distribution something other than the best. The only saving grace is that Anthropic says it&#x
56.
▲
by
avaer
1mo ago
Probably not enough data on this yet since it's a new unlock, but I think it's perfectly possible to do great work today without interfacing with other humans directly. Some weird off-spectrum people (the kind this article is talk
57.
▲
by
avaer
1mo ago
I lament the state of the modern world too. Unfortunately, the modern world is run not by empaths, but by psychopaths. Even if we get to a state where we look out for each other, I fear it would be quickly subverted.
58.
▲
by
avaer
1mo ago
Because people generally will not pay for others to "be". And they will not give you food or shelter if you don't pay. And the money has never been more concentrated away from the people who would prefer to just be. If you do
59.
▲
by
avaer
1mo ago
The reason should be obvious. Powerful people would complain about unfairness/bias otherwise.
60.
▲
by
avaer
1mo ago
What's funny is that extensions were supposed to be a way to let you do the things the browser didn't want you to do. Guess that was a bit too much freedom for Google to accept, so they had to make a store with a gate, and destroy
More ›