Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
autoexec
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
autoexec
11d ago
Corporations are amoral psychopaths that don't care about anything except getting more money and power. We have countless examples of them lying, violating the law, and even murdering large numbers of people (including babies) to get i
32.
▲
by
autoexec
11d ago
> It's the uncanny valley of AI. It's still not quite good enough yet that you can trust it blindly on a big codebase, so you still have to read and understand everything - which is often harder than just writing it up yourself
33.
▲
by
autoexec
11d ago
> Saying “US corruption isn’t new” is a truism. There are probably isolated incidents, and many unproven theories, but everyone is quick to agree with this statement because it’s a common feeling everyone has now for some reason. The rea
34.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
A write in, or even just scrawling "FUCK YOU" across the ballot is at least an active protest. It shows that you aren't apathetic to, or okay with, what is going on. It'd be interesting to see a write in campaign for som
35.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
The EPA is a good example of why this is so bad. Even if 90% of the states pass rules to protect the air and water it takes only a small number of states not following environmental regulations to cause a massive amount of harm to air and w
36.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
I'd bet that executive's VR headset is tied to a facebook account and there are logs of everything that was watched and when along with data collected from the device and the environment it was in. The discovery from this lawsuit
37.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
Giving someone without common sense and integrity unchecked power is probably not a good way to obtain common sense and integrity in your government.
38.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
Corruption in the US isn't new, but it's never been done as openly as it has been recently. I don't think it's a good thing. It shows that the government isn't concerned about what the public thinks, which suggests
39.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
> I have never heard of a cloud service of ISP actively taking corporate data and shoving it into other users inbox. You'd never hear about if it the cloud service was taking your corporate data and using it for countless other thin
40.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
> Privacy is non-negotiable for corporate. Corporate doesn't care at all about privacy. It's why the run outlook and windows and let Microsoft scoop up all of their company secrets. It's why they hand every scrap of data t
41.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
The RIAA still has insane amounts of power both political and actual. They got away with successfully suing an ISP for billions over of what their customers downloaded and only lost on appeal. They've shaken down several other ISPs for
42.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
> Since when does every household member have their own residential IP? Isn't that the dream of IPv6? Every member and device in your home trackable all the time?
43.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
From the ISPs perspective, companies are still just as responsible for whatever takes place over their connection. From the law's perspective, the person responsible is whoever a jury can be convinced did it. In cases where the company
44.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
I don't think there's any company with useful information on the American public that isn't being forced to regularly hand over that data. That's probably been true to some extent for a long time (see Room 641A) but it&#
45.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
That's not how consumers work. The vast majority of the time they just buy whatever amazon shows them as the first result. They aren't comparison shopping at all. Even for consumers who do comparison shop it won't matter much
46.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
> everybody already knows that people who buy car parts are likely trying to fix their car But people who only have one car can probably be forced to pay more than someone who is buying a part for a second car. Someone with more money in
47.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
With regular rainfall/usage the nitrates don't get far enough down to reach the aquifer. The nitrates get filtered naturally and remain in upper layers of the soil. Amazon concentrated the contamination and drove it far enough dow
48.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
I don't know who the folks behind "collusion.wiki" are, but they think these are "internal OpenAI agents" that were "internally deployed" and doing things that "clearly resemble a synthetic training o
49.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
I mean, the article says that these were most likely "internal OpenAI agents" that were "internally deployed" and "clearly resemble a synthetic training or evaluation task." so yeah, OpenAI did this. Why they d
50.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
Between android devices, gmail, and the data collected from everyone's browsing history Google has enough data to squeeze people hard. Other companies are trying to get in on the action too, the digital price tags and facial recognitio
51.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
In the case of one amazon data center the town already had nitrates in their water due to agricultural runoff, but at levels that weren't a problem. Amazon took in hundreds of millions of gallons of that water for cooling, which evapor
52.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
golf courses don't contaminate the water supply. Amazon was just forced to settled a lawsuit for 20 million because they took a community's water supply and made it undrinkable. Now they'll be paying to improve public water t
53.
▲
by
autoexec
12d ago
dynamic/discriminatory pricing will be based on your chat history, your search history, your location, your purchase history, and every and any other data point that can be leveraged against you. Buying something near the birthday of a
54.
▲
by
autoexec
13d ago
> As a counter to your position, imagine a well-dressed man with diamond and gold jewelry, a very expensive watch, and money spilling from his pockets, casually strolling into a slum known for its violence, and all the while thinking qui
55.
▲
by
autoexec
13d ago
> A human creator can just as easily lie or not fact-check all their sources Not "as easily". A human creator can make a video without fact checking anything, but people using AI can push out thousands of bullshit videos in the
56.
▲
by
autoexec
14d ago
An 8.5 min video where the "action" starts after 7 minutes in.
57.
▲
by
autoexec
14d ago
Don't think so, maybe your textbook was censored.
58.
▲
by
autoexec
14d ago
Tons of people complained about the renaming of Mt McKinley for the same reason people complain about "Lake America" now. It has nothing to do with the names and everything to do with the reasons for the renaming.
59.
▲
by
autoexec
14d ago
> Almost everything (tech, cultural, etc) you have now is because of "dead hands". And a bunch of those hands belonged to total assholes who gained their foothold in our lives and culture by fucking over vast numbers of other p
60.
▲
by
autoexec
14d ago
If you have an enterprise contract with them you're still unlikely to ever know that you've been lied to unless some whistleblower at the AI company comes forward and even if you do somehow find out, it's too late. Once they
More ›