andersource

11 ms·

241.
by andersource 6y ago
My guess is that OP intended to submit the response, I was really surprised to see the note in the article and found the response interesting (even the fact of its existence). But that's just my take :)
242.
by andersource 6y ago
The link is not to the paper itself but to a response to the paper, this might be (is probably?) intentional but the title is a bit confusing. Essentially the response, submitted by several ML / CS / math researchers, addresses a
243.
by andersource 6y ago
I've tried it (not OP), and as someone who loves meat (not fanatic though), if I'd been told it's a regular burger there's a decent chance I wouldn't have suspected. Don't remember if the nutritional content is
244.
by andersource 6y ago
The comic is actually referred to in the "about" section (question mark)
245.
by andersource 6y ago
Thank you very much!
246.
by andersource 6y ago
Thank you! I would guess that certain transformations can be efficiently exploited by certain framings, but I have no intuition as to whether some transformations are dominant regardless of the framing. That's a very interesting questi
247.
Exploring how different framings of the same learning task affect performance(andersource.dev)
32 points by andersource 6y ago|4 comments
248.
by andersource 6y ago
I would say there's a whole spectrum: understanding a proof ("recognizing") is on one end. Rewriting a proof from scratch lies along the spectrum but it's not the other end in my opinion. Can you prove a variation? Could
249.
by andersource 6y ago
Personally the way I examine dissatisfaction with a project is by comparing my (mostly subconscious) expectations with reality, then asking why the major gaps exist. These gaps could sometimes be equivalent to the values mentioned in the ar
250.
by andersource 6y ago
Very interesting, thanks!
251.
by andersource 6y ago
Not based on any sources, but I believe that these results say more about our subjective experience of decisions (specifically in situations of action vs. inaction) rather than the actual likelihood of outcomes. In other words, I'm not
252.
by andersource 6y ago
Definitely not a comprehensive treatment, but I wrote about some specific use cases from the basics here: https://andersource.dev/2019/08/25/fun-with-matrix-exponenti...
253.
An 'Inside-Out' Planter That Grows Plants on the Exterior Surface, Without Soil(accesswire.com)
2 points by andersource 6y ago|0 comments
254.
by andersource 6y ago
That's the Pareto principle [0]: 80% of the effects come from roughly 20% of the causes (or effort, in this case). Very hand-wavy but I think that's also the reason things like expertise exhibit a power law distribution - if as yo
255.
by andersource 6y ago
It's interesting how polarizing this article is. After zigzagging several times while reading the comments I just think that reality is more nuanced than "never apologize" or "apologize", and it simply depends on th
256.
The case for better-than-random splits(andersource.dev)
2 points by andersource 6y ago|0 comments
257.
A Random Night Sky(andersource.dev)
1 points by andersource 7y ago|0 comments