Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ado__dev
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
The Self-Driving IDE Is Coming – Steve Yegge
(sourcegraph.com)
3 points
by
ado__dev
2y ago
|
0 comments
62.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
I think you described it perfectly. "Corporate gaming experience" is what MS is selling.
63.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
Microsoft never really got gaming like Sony and Nintendo. Yes, at the end of the day all 3 exist to make as much money as possible, but Microsoft has been the most consistent in pushing the shittiest stuff into the gaming landscape. Paid on
64.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
This is too funny. So basically we're back to cable.
65.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
For me it is. I happily bought a Model 3 back in 2018 and have been generally happy with the purchase. It was a great introduction to EV's and I can safely say, I never want to go back to a gas car, but my next car will 99.999% not be
66.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
Nothing wrong with SO or even using an AI assistant as a jr. You should use any tool that helps you, but I still believe nothing beats practice and doing some manual coding to really learn and understand the concepts.
67.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
You can do this, and sometimes it works, but more often than not it does not. it's basically the blind leading the blind. With the current state of LLM hallucinations, it's very easy to be given bad or outright wrong answers, and
68.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
I think us folks that have been coding for 20+ years can properly utilize AI coding assistants because we can take the code it spits out and usually understand it pretty quickly and debug it if needed. It's just a skill that comes from
69.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
The LAM stuff is a lie. It's all hard coded handlers for the included functionality. Go check out the /rabbitr1 subreddit where you'll find a bunch of security vulnerabilities and more shady shit by this company.
70.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
What motivates them? Good products that solve their issues.
71.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
The CEO/Founder of Rabbit is on the board of TE.
72.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
name one thing the rabbit can do that a smartphone can't.
73.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
Hi there, I run the Developer Advocacy and Community team at Sourcegraph and am very involved with our user community. To answer your questions. - No, we do not engage in buying any comments, bots, or similar. Any time we've done any s
74.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
Would you trust an LLM with that question though? I know I wouldn't.
75.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
Just the cost of doing business.
76.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
A lot of Tesla marketing over the years has been super deceptive to the point that a lot of people assume the car is capable of fully self driving itself. I've had a model 3 since 2018 and the number of people that have asked "do
77.
▲
Local code completion in VS Code with Cody and Ollama
(sourcegraph.com)
3 points
by
ado__dev
2y ago
|
0 comments
78.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
Yeah I think HN has a better balance than most. Reddit by far is the worst about this.
79.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
Self-promo (whether on HN, Reddit, Lobsters) or any social platform seems like the most randomly enforced thing. Popular people can self-promo all the time and never get penalized for it, even when it's super blatant. Other, lesser kno
80.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
To play devil's advocate. Say that on average it was 10x or 100x safer than human drivers, but for whatever reason, there was a 1/1,000,000 chance that the self driving car would plow into traffic at a red light because some black
81.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
I have tried it, and while it's a bit better, it's still nowhere near safe enough to use around other cars/pedestrians imo. Other people's thresholds and looking like a tool on the road may be different, but for me, it&#
82.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
I think it depends on how the car ran over the children (or anyone in that case). If it was an unavoidable freak accident, then you can't really blame the car. But, if the car literally didn't see a person in front of it (where re
83.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
FSD is also much scarier to use because it does ridiculously dangerous stuff all the time. (for me in Vegas, having had it since the original beta) I've stopped using it unless I'm the only person on the road.
84.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
Drivers fault 100%. But Tesla is not blameless with their marketing "Autopilot", "Full self driving", blah blah, giving people a false sense of security. I can't think of a worse problem to try and solve with AI. GP
85.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
Is this a real question?
86.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
Yeah, I have a lot more faith that Google and Apple will properly secure my private data vs a random startup.
87.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
Not surprised at all. This and the Humane Pin both seemed like a quick cash grab before phones integrated all the new AI goodness. I'm expecting we'll see that window close by the time I/O and WWDC wrap up this year, so they
88.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
+ tax + a case for it puts it at over $4k.
89.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
Android has ~70% of the global smartphone marketshare. Personally, I've moved off of Android to Apple in 2019 because I was done with tinkering and just wanted a device that worked well (even if locked down in an ecosystem).
90.
▲
by
ado__dev
2y ago
The lack of a killer app suite alongside the $4k price-point is what kept me at bay.
More ›