__float

6 ms·

31.
by __float 4mo ago
What do you recommend then? DNS doesn't usually change that often, but if you mess it up when it does, you're in for some pain if TTLs are high!
32.
by __float 5mo ago
Did that mean success rate from multiple runs or speed for a single run?
33.
by __float 6mo ago
You can set a minimum age for packages ( https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/reference/supply-ch... ), though that's not perfect (and becomes less effective if everyone uses it).
34.
by __float 6mo ago
Sometimes code generation is a useful tool, and maybe people have read and reviewed the generator. The difference here is that the generator is a non-deterministic LLM and you can't reason about its output the same way.
35.
by __float 6mo ago
They may want proof that you, the human filling out this form, are authorized to publish apps, communications, etc. as the company you say you represent.
36.
by __float 6mo ago
"uv" is a very widely used tool in the Python ecosystem, and Python is important to AI. Calling it "a random Python packaging org" seems a bit unfair.
37.
by __float 7mo ago
While I don’t think the new meaning is incredibly widespread yet, it’s not uncommon for words to change meaning over time. I wouldn’t be surprised if a decade or two from now, the original meaning has been mostly forgotten.
38.
by __float 7mo ago
Err, what do you mean they cannot do anything? Where are you meeting these programmers??
39.
by __float 7mo ago
I mean, two of them are cloud vendors. The rest just seem like very boring components of a (somewhat) modern data pipeline.
40.
by __float 7mo ago
What are the common terms for those? (I have heard "devbox" across multiple companies, and I'm not in the LLM world enough to know the other parts.)
41.
by __float 7mo ago
I've worked for years at companies that only use Google Sheets. For 99% of people (sometimes we let Finance folks have an Excel license), it's more than enough. Google Apps Script is also reasonably useful, and the newer Smart Chi
42.
by __float 7mo ago
It's not, because it's a conspiracy theory. They'll make tenuous connections between unrelated things and extrapolate some grand scheme to match their fiction.
43.
by __float 7mo ago
Sometimes political views should actually get you shunned. You're always free to create a fork.
44.
by __float 7mo ago
That's part of my problem. I actually don't love how many billion options Anki has, and I'd love something with a more opinionated UI. (I think the data model underneath Anki is...showing its age (and lack of explicit design)
45.
by __float 8mo ago
The (paid!) iOS client has always been a disappointment to me, and I've long been jealous of the open source Android one. I don't mind so much that it's paid, given how much use I get for the price, but it sucks knowing it
46.
by __float 8mo ago
This is kind of a weird request, IMO. If you're a homelab NixOS user, isn't it on you to try to answer these questions? A home lab is for learning, and if you don't want to do that, what's the point?
47.
by __float 8mo ago
The second paragraph explains this: they already have paid, and some people have paid [again], but their purchase is not accepted.
48.
by __float 8mo ago
Maybe this is a naive take, but I don't really think LLMs have done that much to change the actual situation around ability/outcomes. If you are actually a very good C# programmer, knowing Swift and searching some Apple documentat
49.
by __float 8mo ago
There's a huge amount you're missing by boiling down their complaint to "bubble sorts or inelegant code". The architecture of the new code, how it fits into the existing system, whether it makes use of existing utility c
50.
by __float 8mo ago
> That turned into about 10 hours of conversation with Claude to pull it all together. Did the author write an actual parser, or does this mean they spent 10 hours coaxing Claude into writing this blog post? There's not a lot of dep
51.
by __float 9mo ago
You're counting the cost of running the model, but what about training it? You can't count the compute and data costs at $0.
52.
by __float 9mo ago
Trump was never debanked. To my recollection, no protesters in the trucker convoys were either. Some social media accounts were suspended and fundraisers were stopped.
53.
by __float 9mo ago
> Yet software developed in C, with all of the foibles of its string routines, has been sold and running for years with trillions of USD is total sales. This doesn't seem very relevant. The same can be said of countless other bad AP
54.
by __float 9mo ago
You might find https://blog.jez.io/history-of-sorbet-syntax/ interesting, written by one of the primary contributors to Sorbet. Sorbet is a bit different from TypeScript because it has runtime type checking, not just s
55.
by __float 9mo ago
If I remember correctly, the namespaces feature (now released as Ruby::Box) had some pretty severe performance penalties (possibly even for code that doesn't use it?). Does anyone know if that's been improved?
56.
by __float 9mo ago
I work in a large Sorbet codebase (though it isn't a Rails one) and it's a huge boon IMO. The number of tests we don't need to write because of Sorbet is really nice. It does occasionally require structuring your code diffe
57.
by __float 9mo ago
I think so: it looks like "UniFi Teleport" is also based on Wireguard. You can also do this with a travel router like one of GL.iNet's and Tailscale subnet routers.
58.
by __float 9mo ago
It's a bit surprising they did that, to be honest. I work at a similarly-sized, HN-popular tech company and our security team is very strict about less-trusted (third party!!) code running on another domain, or a subdomain at the very
59.
by __float 9mo ago
Jenkins Groovy is awful and full of footguns. Have you ever run into a serialization exception? It's too powerful and there are too many of its implementation details exposed to the user.
60.
by __float 9mo ago
This thread is largely commentary on the technical aspects of GitHub Actions. The fact the business gives away free compute is irrelevant and more a discussion of their marketing budget.

More ›