Splizard

5 ms·

31.
Duplex Numbers(duplexnumbers.com)
1 points by Splizard 1y ago|0 comments
32.
by Splizard 1y ago
> makes it easier for integrators to build a robust integration with you No, don't say 'easier'. It makes it possible to build a robust integration. We need to stop with this notion that omiting idempotency from an API j
33.
by Splizard 2y ago
> The second part demonstrates how agents communicate with each other through workflows defined in YAML oh no
34.
by Splizard 2y ago
You've set the Go code to use int64 but the other faster implementations are using int32.
35.
by Splizard 2y ago
Why create a new language, rather than use an established programming language like Go where you can actually write an implementation too?
36.
by Splizard 2y ago
I think the point the author is trying to express here, is that it can be a useful in API representation, to couple the design with other representations designed by other parties. I don't think "No Abstractions" is a good fr
37.
Rice's Theorem and Software Failures(blog.relyabilit.ie)
1 points by Splizard 2y ago|0 comments
38.
Freedom to Own: Open-Sourcing the Mirror(themirror.space)
3 points by Splizard 3y ago|0 comments
39.
by Splizard 3y ago
Alignment, if you add a uint8 tag for example, you'll end up effectively doubling your pointer size.
40.
by Splizard 3y ago
Consider a codebase where all variables are consistently named with single letters and all values are string-typed for consistency. Somebody comes along and creates a new, isolated piece of functionality using words for variable names and u
41.
by Splizard 3y ago
Code unambiguously defines 'what' it's doing, so I'm not sure what value technical consistency provides. If anything, consistency hurts the capacity for developers to generalise their understanding of a system. Differenc
42.
by Splizard 3y ago
I guess the 1-2 star feedback is pretty useful then, it gives a good indication of how good your marketing is (the conclusion here being that only people who like the product/project should be buying/ using it).
43.
by Splizard 3y ago
get rid of the cable!
44.
by Splizard 4y ago
The incentive is to sell the developed property for a profit. The state would be responsible for determining what the reasonable occupancy rates are on properties for sale or under development. A paid occupier (perhaps a real-estate agent)
45.
by Splizard 4y ago
This 18 year old can get a loan, they can pool together with a group of flatmates to purchase a property together or they can live in staffed accommodation, such as a dorms, motel, hotel or hostel. They can purchase a room in a boarding hou
46.
by Splizard 4y ago
These businesses should be paid by the landlord to occupy (and therefore maintain) the property for them. This notion that you can own land without occupying it (or paying somebody to occupy it) is an absurdly backwards idea that is respons
47.
by Splizard 4y ago
There's not a lot of context here around what exactly this means in relation to your project, however what this could mean, is that the project is more of a minimum-viable implementation rather than a customer-facing product/ser
48.
by Splizard 4y ago
Enum supports an exhaustive Switch as well, here's an example based on the blog post: https://go.dev/play/p/Ef78vLyw33g
49.
by Splizard 4y ago
Sum types: https://go.dev/play/p/R7Bhy2LDmde Enums: https://go.dev/play/p/MnbmE0B3sSE Here you go.
50.
by Splizard 4y ago
Go 1.18 supports type-safe enums and sum types. It takes 300loc to implement.
51.
by Splizard 4y ago
No, it does. Go 1.18 supports closed enums.
52.
by Splizard 4y ago
Right, the builtin switch statement is not exhaustive but you can quite easily create a Switch method on your enum type in Go 1.18+ that is exhaustive.
53.
by Splizard 4y ago
Since 1.18 was released it's now trivial to implement compile-time (safe) 'sum types' in Go. They're fully supported. It's about 300loc to implement and then sum types can be defined declaratively just like any oth
54.
by Splizard 4y ago
SYSTEMANTICS. THE SYSTEMS BIBLE / How Systems Work and Especially How They Fail
55.
by Splizard 4y ago
> but the messaging and coordination system in itself does not produce energy. Isn't this exactly how energy works? Aren't photons, electrons and other force carriers merely message passing?
56.
by Splizard 4y ago
Money is a form of energy, where conservation and the laws of thermodynamics apply. I'm surprised that there isn't widespread understanding of this. The common understanding appears to be that money is just an imaginary human-th
57.
by Splizard 5y ago
So the answer is, standardize communication/protocols but leave procedure to the free market?
58.
by Splizard 5y ago
Except when Tim decides to standardize how each micro-service is built, using a custom framework...
59.
by Splizard 5y ago
Let me SSH into a cluster and navigate the configuration database like a virtual filesystem. Make it feel more like a traditional operating system. That will make Kubernetes more approachable.
60.
by Splizard 5y ago
Currencies are energy stores.

More ›