RubyPinch

8 ms·

121.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
I honestly prefer it when editing <p> It naturally acts as a clean way to segment paragraphs of text <p> And most of the tag-closing rules are roughly matched with the rules of using p t
122.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
> A p element's end tag may be omitted if the p element is immediately followed by block-ish element, or if there is no more content in the parent element. > This doesn't apply if you are doing weird stuff in a non-block-ish
123.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
Its optional though. If you don't want it, don't add it
124.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
It still bothers me. I don't know whether I just don't understand the differences in culture (between theirs and mine), or whether I can't remember how I used to socialize back in my high-school days, but the reactions always
125.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
The reduced usecase (story?) is the following The customer requests the following @? class somename (?): an_attr_a = ADescriptor(somestuff) an_attr_1 = ADescriptor(somestuff) an_attr_a1 = ADescriptor(somest
126.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
> The dev of uBlock directs users to download and use uBlock Origin instead. They do? still doesn't seem like that, e.g. https://www.ublock.org all links go to ublock, except for one link on the AMO site
127.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
https://acceptableads.com/en/ for anyone who was looking for it
128.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
what, not using metaclasses in that case caused more "issues" than would of been caused by using metaclasses multiple global values to track state, since can't bind the state to the class' creation, since the conversion
129.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
> No need for metaclasses simply to make the class construction locals dict an ordered dict. ORM library devs will be happy. understatement with that. Saw someone trying to avoid using a metaclass for that, "had" to use descrip
130.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
> But why do you get to question Facebook's idea of morality? well, its literally a discussion on facebook's morality. Its a bit hard to talk about that without questioning it. > To question someone's morality solely du
131.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
Well, it can, but it does still make a weird line in the sand You can be naked for the following reasons: Breastfeeding, Satire, Comedy, Artistic (but only photos of art), educational, and surgery (but only reconstructive) but being naked b
132.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
so, hoster doesn't escape anything the users provide, and is more concerned about CSS instead of JS? And then their site broke as soon as I clicked a link
133.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
Naming and shaming is also going to paint a big target on that company's head, since, you know, they collect plaintext data n' stuff
134.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
I think the thing to learn from the article is "how to go deep diving into an operating system's internals"
135.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
a 256x256 keyboard icon, is going to look pretty bad at 1cm x 1cm A bunch of details really close together looks like noise, not information
136.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
the excessively excited "omg how could you even be discussing this??" is a bit offputting Isn't there APIs for safely storing passwords outside of config data?
137.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
That is just 2fac, isn't it?
138.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
from [3] > If you're not sure what this means, our product is Not For You. Please don't do that, its childish and unimpressive.
139.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
Generally, if you comment less about Go, then you end up in less discussions about it
140.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
But where is the notable negative impact to those two people's lives? I ain't denying that he was being a goober to them, but "at their expense" implies its at their expense I don't see how it goes further than, the
141.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
How was it at someone else's expense?
142.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
Could that not just be shuffled into the CI side of things issues occur -> redeploy last-1 deployment
143.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
is there any compile-to-javascript languages which would be termed as "disgusting" and "impure"? https://github.com/dropbox/pyxl for python comes to mind as something more enjoyable than manually do
144.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
All great and dandy, but I can't help to think what the continued fallout is going to be. If someone is willing to smash your door down because you called them out on their dealings or perceived dealings, then that person is a threat t
145.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
I noticed (in the original article) an almost complete lack of entertaining the thought that they mite have (edit: fixed grammer) been acting maliciously on someone else's behalf. So that is exactly what happened. And man, I don't
146.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
I feel like a person should be able to back their opinion up (for a specific case, not in general), instead of just mindlessly quoting a line from a bible.
147.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
its "safe" to say that, like its also "safe" to say that <article> will be used to denote articles in HTML Yes, decorators can do whatever they want, but, in practical usage I'd say a majority of decorator usa
148.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
I know how decorators work and you might be missing the point I was making by a fair mile The following don't mutate the mental map of how the function works, its "this function is still what I typed": "add logging&quo
149.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
It feels a bit hampered by "bad" design decisions to me I think its safe to say that the current view of what decorators do is, a) filter things going to functions (so they error, or hit a cache), or b) register a function with an
150.
by RubyPinch 10y ago
I'd be asking the question of wether anything depended on `more` that couldn't depend on `less` already, but instead depends on more because more is not less. Or, in other words, maybe the issue is cultural instead of technical, w

More ›