RealityVoid

6 ms·

31.
by RealityVoid 1mo ago
According to wikipedia, microscopic is considered up to 1 micron. [1] According to the Schwartzchild formula [2] r=(2 G m)/(c^2) so if I take the largest black hole the definition would allow, the mass would be about 10% of the moon. Y
32.
by RealityVoid 1mo ago
Sure, but the mass is not specified so I just assumed the closest one to cosmic horror.
33.
by RealityVoid 1mo ago
The amount of mass inside the universe has stayed the same, it just moved from the boat into the black hole. You're really bored at work one day so to entertain yourself you create 1kg of antimatter along with 1kg of matter. Has the ma
34.
by RealityVoid 1mo ago
The water level decreases, along with the shore and anything with it falling within the event horizon. Any other apocalyptic brain teasers?
35.
by RealityVoid 1mo ago
Lake level stays the same.
36.
by RealityVoid 1mo ago
What do you think would be the effect on people that already have the skills and abilities. The LLM would build these systems using the skills that are largely understood by the programmer but piece them in new ways suitable for the system.
37.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
What happens to the local price of oil if you are able to export the oil at a much higher price?
38.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
Yes, owns. Ownership as in accountability, stewardship and care. But I think you already got this from my post and if we're fighting about semantics, there's no constructive discussion to be had.
39.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
When an employee writes a system, the employee owns the system. When an AI writes a system for you, YOU own the system.
40.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
Tools? Yes. Reliable foundations? Eh, mostly not. Maybe I'm holding it wrong, but I'm not impressed. Not in the least because in order to get a good system you must have a good image of the system in your head. And if AI builds th
41.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
Would you say... You have arrived at a compromise? Ba-dum-tshh!
42.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
Yes, but that is a different kind of improvement compared to note king during a lecture as an adult. I think hadriting ability is important, I just don't think note taking dutin a lecture is useful in any way.
43.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
Certain kinds of writing is thinking, but you're not writing in the thinking way, you're transcribing.
44.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
Or... Hear me out... Don't take notes at all. I'm sure I can find supporting material that is just much better than my paltry notes. I find that for me, it detracts from engaging with the material. I just much better prefer to lis
45.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
This scenario is pretty similar to the Azolla event: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azolla_event Where "event" in this case is something that happened over an 800 000 years interval.
46.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
> it’s a voluntary industry standard that has no government oversight or regulatory authority. Yes, hence why I said I'm not sure about enforcement mechanisms how they stack up against the aviation standard. Still, in my limited ex
47.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
> don’t have anything like the verification and documentation processes that are mandated by DO-178 ISO 26262? Not sure how the enforcement looks, but automotive is pretty serious about ISO 26262. Still, the infotainment is most likely
48.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
They make many many many more things than just powertools. They have ebike motors, home appliances, industrial machinery, chips (they have a very good division for MEMS as far as I can tell, they make high quality IMU's, they are super
49.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
Real time control can be like that as long as the computing parts are clearly bound within your performance requirement.
50.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
Falcon rockets, starlink, Tesla. They all pushed the envelope in their field. Are the stocks overpriced? Yes. Did they do impressive technical work? Also yes. They might get surpassed by competitors, but that is to be expected for all compa
51.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
OP is from Palo Alto, so, obviously, the closest thing to a hellscape you can possibly get. /s
52.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
This is obviously an overstatement. Sure, a phone is convenient, but we managed to function just fine without smartphones. I assure you, it's possible to do all those things without a phone.
53.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
Can you back this up with any authoritative sources?
54.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
This is not a radar, only a receiver.
55.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
According to CivDiv's channel about 70% of the drones used are still RC FPV drones. They are cheaper longer range and have a slightly simpler supply chain. Fiber optic cable prices have exploded because of the war.
56.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
It's not as easy as plopping a new SW on it. Have you wondered why, despite this conflict dragging on for this long, autonomous targeting is still not common? It's just much harder to do, and doing it reliably is actually super ha
57.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
It's probably doing a lot of heavy lifting.
58.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
I think one way communication should be sufficient together with a shared secret. It's probably less reliable compared to two way communication, but it should satisfy the criteria. IR visual pattern propagation will respect this. You d
59.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
I would have expected the right wing parties to be against this, somehow, but... Nope, just checked my country's votes, and nationalists just love cc1.0 it seems.
60.
by RealityVoid 2mo ago
I think you can do this relatively simply with infrared led lights. Imagine "Please don't kill me" remote controls. You are a bit more visible when broadcasting, but presumably you can be selective when turning it on.

More ›