RandomLensman

5 ms·

181.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Why would it not be bottlenecked? Is intelligence so valuable as such?
182.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Why not make education free(ish) then?
183.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Lending is a business in itself, no?
184.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
How do you use that to predict which atom decays next?
185.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Of course, there would be an expectation for loan repayment (most likely from employment somewhere). Is any unsecured/uncollateralized loan indentured servitude for you then?
186.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Not sure I understand: why would a loan be indentured servitude if it funds an education (not binding employment etc.)?
187.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
If it is quite profitable to get a certain education, why would it need the tax payer to provide the loan for it? Shouldn't that be easy to fund from the private sector?
188.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Could also reverse it: Why should tax payers cover things that pay off anyway.
189.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
What if it takes decades or centuries to pay off for society and perhaps never for the individual (in strictly monetary terms)? How should these things be funded? Could also look the other way around: if things pay off anyway, why should sh
190.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
How would that work as current understanding from quantum theory is that we cannot predict which atom decays next? Is there a quantum algorithm that can do that?
191.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
I don't have the answers here, I a afraid, but not having at least the broader discussion might also not help (not sure what is already happening there, though).
192.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
How to build a Turing machine to tell which one of ten atoms of a radioactive element decays next?
193.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
If there is a lot of change to how the night sky looks like could perhaps be worth a discussion on if the process is still the right one (and if it is global enough).
194.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Biological weapons? Yes, there is research on defense, but no big arsenals of weapons etc. My impression from the origin of the bioweapons convention is that collectively people decided that these things are too dangerous in various ways fo
195.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Would you say it might at least be fair to discuss how things that affect everyone are decided upon or how externalities are compensated for? Or should it be free for all?
196.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
It started in 2007. I don't see the peak oil connection there - what is it?
197.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
GFC = Great Financial Crisis. I'd look at that first rather than some peak oil for Europe's underperformance.
198.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Isn't TRUMPF a German company?
199.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
If have a hard time linking a slowdown from 2007 on to oil instead of the GFC.
200.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
How do you get enough data? If, for example, you need a lot of people in the sample, that might not be so easy. In the abstract, should it not come done to what is the best experimental design for each case?
201.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
The laser and optics for the EUV light source are from the US?
202.
by RandomLensman 3mo ago
What's an example of a report rejected because of the use of VAERS data itself?
203.
by RandomLensman 3mo ago
> In directly applied math, such as engineering, it is in fact much more common to work with unproven but well tested conjectures. What specific areas were you thinking off? I don't recall, e.g., in numerics that things were often
204.
by RandomLensman 3mo ago
Then you have to make sure that the AIs understand the theorems (sort of build a "world" for that - otherwise how'd there be confidence in the use of said theorems? If cryptography didn't exist but the maths did, how&#x2
205.
by RandomLensman 3mo ago
What don't you like about current reporting such as VAERS? Where do you see the barriers there specifically? Do you have examples of doctors getting their licenses revoked for reporting something?
206.
by RandomLensman 3mo ago
How would you suggest to establish causality?
207.
by RandomLensman 3mo ago
Don't know. But would standard smaller trials have captured it? We are kind of back to my initial question that is conceptually unrelated to the vaccine trial: do you need trials to run into millions or billions of participants or into
208.
by RandomLensman 3mo ago
Who refused to acknowledge there could be adverse effects? I certainly was given information prior to vaccination that outlined possible adverse side effects.
209.
by RandomLensman 3mo ago
Operation Warpspeed addressed that by running a very large stage 3 trial. One reason that isn't normally done is the high cost of such a large trial.
210.
by RandomLensman 3mo ago
How large a trial do you want to run to capture "rare conditions"? Millions? Billions of participants? How long do you want to run trials? Years? Decades?

More ›