RandomLensman

6 ms·

121.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
You think voters had no role there? I don't see nuclear power enjoying some constitutional protection as such, so choosing against it seems ok.
122.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Arguably, a lot things are kind of incomprehensible on average today.
123.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Math might get a lot bigger and then there might be proportionately fewer people but not necessarily in total. Unless humans play no role in economics, business, society, etc., I doubt human intermediation and discovery (or direction of dis
124.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
That is mostly my argument. I find "computer doing things" generally not a useful category and why here specifically doesn't have enough support. If there are some truly high risk gaps, then why no close them specifically?
125.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Why and why would it need to be a crime? Again, we don't label machine additions, for example.
126.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Compliance burden tend to favor the large, which is not what I think is a direction that needs more pushing into. (I also think that labels will quickly become just "background noise" that is mostly ignored.)
127.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Buying a license for a stock photo vs using AI to create what you need is cutting corners? Don't thing there is much difference in effort (might even be more on the latter)?
128.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Some generic picture used as like icon: is the labeling critical there?
129.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
My suspicion is that it will quickly not matter in a lot 9f situations for most users, customers, etc. - so might be easier and better to curate places of true human interaction, for example, instead of the other way around.
130.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Label additions done by machines vs those by humans?
131.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Doesn't need to be hydrogen - plenty of possible substances that could be used as storage (might not even need to be gaseous for some applications).
132.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
As we can store fossil fuels for weeks of demand, we can store the required energy in chemical form, no? Germany has huge natural gas storage, for ezample.
133.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
The difference might be that I don't believe in these "machine gods of cleaning" being the thing to arrive (looking at current consumer goods) and then the boundary for what to choose shifts a lot if one is willing to deal wi
134.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
The last point I can get behind as it is a clear advantage, the other ones might need some more superhuman abilities that I'd not accept as given until demonstrated in extenso.
135.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
I might even get one as I like trying new tech if and when, but I have no issue with hiring humans either and humans so far "fail" very differently from machines (as in a lot of software). I find the latter far less predictable an
136.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
I think machines are just unpredictable in different ways (for example, changes from software updates).
137.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Not irony: why manage machines with all the issues that go with that instead of people?
138.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
If there is a subscription in there somewhere, prices could change.
139.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
You'd need to manage the robot, too, I would think. In my experience, I rather manage people than machines.
140.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Not sure it is just about inference costs, errors in handling things and beings in the real world have a very different "surface" from immaterial applications - robots might need to have failsafes, independent limiters, etc. there
141.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Honestly: why?
142.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
> It can better detect when humans are nearby, trigger safety tool calls and bring the robot to a safe stop if someone approaches too closely. If the robots stop when humans are too close, wouldn't that mean that robots for close in
143.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
The taking care of the book for 70y does not involve recreating the book over and over again to keep it readable or keeping a reading machine in working condition (or be able to recreate it). It's an entirely different level of care. I
144.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
No immediate benefits but could be beneficial long-term (increased well-being but not the same as learning). Whether things in Czechia are comparable to that US situation I wouldn't know.
145.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
I would not call needing weeks or months not a problem (assuming you also get the potentially proprietary software to understand the data recovered). Also, early hard drives weigh 100s of kilograms, so just physically handling them is diffi
146.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Not at all the same thing - what equipment do you need to read hieroglyphs on top of understanding the language (which goes for digital, too)? If you have the paper and understand the language, that's it. We already can see that access
147.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
> Every constraint on the table. Tighten those enough and something interesting happens, you end up with only one possible solution. Is there always a unique solution? If constraints A is tightened and then determines the outcome, could
148.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
That is sufficient to make it real for most intents and purposes.
149.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
Yes, so quite limited in scope. We have no experience with storing and keeping accessible electronic records for hundreds of years, though, but we know already that accessing old storage media and formats isn't necessarily easy.
150.
by RandomLensman 2mo ago
You need a machine (hardware and software) to read digital copies, not just the digital copies.

More ›