Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
IIIIIIIIIIII
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
That reminds me of this cartoon: http://i.imgur.com/aI80YDO.jpg
32.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
From your previous comment, above, that I didn't respond to: > that substantiates your earlier claim that "no one is ever forcibly removed by police and if they needed to be, it wouldn't require training". Fortunately
33.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
The numbers for police actions comparing Germany and the US speak a clear language. Any kind of violence is on a far lower level than in the US. We don't need to talk about the reasons - policing in the US is harder - but your argument
34.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
> he aggressively refused. No comment necessary, you already did it yourself.
35.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
That does not change anything I wrote. > Because when there are no options left, you only have force. It actually makes it worse that you try to justify it. You used your brainpower to find a justification for what is. But there is none.
36.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
> and they aren't as well trained as united employees I'm really getting (maybe needlessly) a bit irate over the endless stream of "they didn't have the training" comments each and every time some employee attac
37.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
That demonstrates that there are no negative G forces. It doesn't demonstrate that it's 1G. I'm a private pilot who has done aerobatics, exactly 1G doesn't work - and it's completely unnecessary (though you can st
38.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
Somewhat related to this discussion - it's really worth the one hour: Secret History of Silicon Valley https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTC_RxWN_xo TL;DW The foundation for SV was laid during WWII by unrestrained spendi
39.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
It's a good indicator for your intentions in this discussion that you only come up with ever new (and ever more ridiculous) "reasons" after being challenged. And "famous", what for exactly - and to whom? For existin
40.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
I'm not sure what to make of your comment, it's a little.. "weltfremd" (unworldly says the dictionary, not sure if that conveys the same meaning as in German though). There are MANY ways around it. It is like lobbying: B
41.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
If you see humanity as a brain and a human like a neuron, the network produces outcomes unimaginable from looking at the individual. Which is easy if you look at an individual stone-age human, and even they are actually more advanced thanks
42.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
You assume ads will be recognizable as such, but even today we have ads that few people recognize. From waves of reddit /r/funny posts about certain sitcoms or sugary beverages to product placements in articles, shows, films to ma
43.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
Your question has been answered already, I'd just like to point out there is a second "advanced" mode in uBlock Origin: Basically, you disable loading of everything by default and a click on the icon shows you what servers th
44.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
This is not the end of the arms race. At some point we will have AI designing and AI delivering ads, and while we may have AI designed to prevent us from having to watch ads we don't want we will also have AI that watches everything, g
45.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
Could be true... it made me click, and I only click on every 15th headline or even less.
46.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
So, I'm not allowed to say that your complaint has already been addressed by the very architecture of this site and that ironically you waste your and everybody else's time much more so than what you complain about?
47.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
Are... are you alright, sir?
48.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
> I didn't intend on reversing a question. I didn't talk about "intent" but about what you did . > Nope. Ahh, somebody likes selective quoting. Care to read the entire section next time? > If you knew me, you m
49.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
As I said: just don't vote , period. You are not the only reader. The problem of what rises to the front has been solved - by voting. You add noting but completely useless noise, making your complaint quite ironic.
50.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
What does that have to do with the topic??? Do you think newspapers should report illnesses of old people? What a risible response!
51.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
Newspapers - major newspapers, not yellow press - in Germany reported that the British queen had a cold. And you complain about an actual IT subject making it to the frontpage? Democratically (s)elected by the visitors of this site no les
52.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
You reverse the questions. Why? The man didn't do anything, he just sat there. Those who did do something where those who injured him. Who was bleeding, the police, a United airlines person - or the passenger? But it is interesting t
53.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
The article that I just read following the submitted link was from the perspective of neither, but of someone looking at the hiring process as an observer. The anecdotes are anecdotes and they don't matter except to lighten up a news
54.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
It's not an either or - the second (money) merely is a lot easier if the first exists. I've seen startups soon dominated by thoughts of the private jet for the executives and all thoughts dominated by money, wealth and power. Gu
55.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
There was a discussion in another thread (forgot where I saw it) where this exact same topic and video was discussed, and the summary is they seem to have completely messed up their SWIR setup. Well, it's pretty apparent, that technolo
56.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
The problem probably isn't the situation 364.8 days per year, but what happens that one time every few years when weather (typhoons) and maybe even the tides align to create conditions much worse than average for just a few hours. See
57.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
> allows a bank to lend out N times more than what it has in saving deposit. That is not quite how it works according to the Bank of England: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/quarte... A
58.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
I'm just curious since I never used this feature, are you talking about this issue? > The "Unicode Problem" > Since DOMStrings are 16-bit-encoded strings, in most browsers calling window.btoa on a Unicode string will ca
59.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
Uhm... I described an "either...or". So, which one? or do you mean one in which inequality already is a problem? Naturally. The question is if robots change it towards more inequality or less.
60.
▲
by
IIIIIIIIIIII
9y ago
> They have more in common with software developers than with welfare or disability recipients. That was the point of the argument: Will people be the winners and robots the "slaves", or will there be only a few capital owner
More ›