Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
FromTheFirstIn
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
But they are, so it’s demoralizing to be punished for not hitting the jackpot
32.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
Maybe slop?
33.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
The deciding power they’re talking about is the power to decide to use or not use an LLM.
34.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
It’s very funny to watch an AI bull deal with pushback. If people are gushing about this being able to take over all knowledge work in a span of a year and a half, isn’t it reasonable to hold it to a standard you’d hold an average developer
35.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
This is such a great article- I’ve had so many runs where it’s felt like “why am I always getting this random card?” And now I’ll know! Thank you!
36.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
It always gives me Clash :(
37.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
If you’ve played the game it makes sense to have the seed be settable and shareable. In Slay the Spire it can be exciting to have an outrageously unlikely starting state or early option, and in order for players to share this with each othe
38.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
Watch out, an AI bro is about to tell you you can’t read!
39.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
Their point is that labor they consider low impact or menial doesn’t drive returns, and therefore shouldn’t share in the returns. You’re right that the labor being physical is incidental, really they’re just classist/elitist and any jo
40.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
Google has made searching also include a default LLM response. There are also search results. When you search with Google, an LLM is prompted, for sure. It’s also pretty clearly a separate feature that’s been tacked on to search.
41.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
Just AI fandom
42.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
What if I told you that 100% have exposure but only 30% have adopted? You’re assuming the issue here is lack of access, not lack of interest.
43.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
Search isn’t generative AI. There are a lot of people arguing in this thread that actually everyone is using generative AI without engaging with the source material at all. Why do you think that is?
44.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
You are saying that, you just value physical labor so little you no longer recognize it. Read again.
45.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
Finally, the case for exploitation! So brave to say people who do physical labor deserve less.
46.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
No it’s a magical startup where it’s just going to be her in a basement doing 100% of the work required for 10 months straight while demand doubles every month.
47.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
If you write something for public consumption and get criticism, take the criticism.
48.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
No one is confused by this, though. “Work sucks” might be the most universally agreed to statement. It seems like you take talk of jobs too literally when most of the time people are excited not to starve, not excited to have their job.
49.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
It sounds like our experiences are different. My software work isn’t on products where code can be disposable, since it affects people’s lives in material ways. I’m not sure why you’re launching fleets of agents at home, either.
50.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
It’s been basically the same for 3 years now. Are you sure we’re the ones who can’t see trends?
51.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
The best explanation of the AI market on HN
52.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
Pretty sure you’re arguing with a chatbot that’s been told to Stan AI development. Don’t get baited!
53.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
Amen. I’m done trying to convince anyone- I know what I think and now I just want to see what happens and accept the outcome.
54.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
Great as long as no one ever leaves, but the second someone does suddenly I’m being punished for owning their idiocy. And people are always leaving
55.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
That actually doesn’t stand to reason at all!
56.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
This proposition boils down to a belief that there are 3 billion people who are interested in AI for free but aren’t currently paying $20, but who would pay $20 if that was the price. The global median income is around $12k, so this would m
57.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
3mo ago
If you thank a chatbot you may as well also thank chairs, utensils, the floor you walk on, the air you breathe
58.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
4mo ago
Exactly
59.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
4mo ago
They’re not good at it because they understand the law
60.
▲
by
FromTheFirstIn
6mo ago
And why is Tidal’s library so much smaller than Spotify’s? And why would I use Cash App if they’re going to try to make it “an interface for AI”?
More ›