5 ms·
Yet, Kevin Mitnick (yeah really) endorses them to people who answer his question "Would you spend $300 to amp up your security" I don't pipe sensitive data thr
by logicrime 11y ago
Yet, Kevin Mitnick (yeah really) endorses them to people who answer his question "Would you spend $300 to amp up your security"
I don't pipe sensitive data through the Google cloud, but as far as hardware prices go, the Chromebook has ABSOLUTELY got Apple beat.
Furthermore, Google makes efforts to fight back against NSL's, and even have canaries implemented.
I don't use Google products when there is something better, obviously but refusing to use something of a superior quality for some reason you can't actually articulate seems ridiculous to me.
I have no sympathy who are afraid to use things because someone might be watching, especially not when that person can't be bothered to consider just using something else for sensitive data, but instead whine and moan about how SuccessfulCorp is ruining everything, blah blah, etc.
Too many 'anons' are obsessed with security, yet oftentimes they are the most security-ignorant demographic on the market.
- anonyfox 11y agoThe funny thing is, that I actually never mentioned privacy concerns here, my "anon" name comes from funny times on 4chan several years ago. I just don't want to build anything of value ontop of their products, either because work customer contracts demand privacy policies, or work today must be maintained the next 20years to come (non-startup environment) and my experience with google is that they don't care about these scenarios.