6 ms·
While I see what you're saying, I doubt you would claim to 'use' assembly when writing a C++ codebase - because (unless you're doing very low-level hand optimiz
by TimSAstro 11y ago
While I see what you're saying, I doubt you would claim to 'use' assembly when writing a C++ codebase - because (unless you're doing very low-level hand optimizations of the kind that get ever rarer), someone else has done the hard work of creating a compiler to do the translation for you. Same thing with NumPy et al, except one level higher up the abstraction stack.
- dekhn 11y agoActually, that's precisely what I do, except it's called machine language, not assembly. That is because assembly is an intermediate format above machine language (it's symbolic).