6 ms·
Thanks for your reply. Price x12 like you said is standard, it's the x10x12 that caught me off guard. I think some language and price listing adjustments like
by habith 11y ago
Thanks for your reply. Price x12 like you said is standard, it's the x10x12 that caught me off guard.
I think some language and price listing adjustments like you suggested would be a great improvement. Even if it's as simple as $32.5 per user pack per month (charged yearly).
- sytse 11y agoI don't think pricing per user pack is what people expect, per user seems to be the more common question.
- habith 11y agoBut you _charge_ per user pack, do you not? Can we purchase 17 licenses? How about 23? We have around 20 Backblaze licenses that we pay a bit over $1000 per year for. It makes sense for them to advertise the price per user because they charge us that way. This is akin to Pepsi sticking a huge sign over their 24 pack at the department store saying "NOW ONLY 99 CENTS PER CAN!" minimum 24, in increments of 24. Anyway, like I said, the way the pricing is advertised turned an interested/potential customer away.
- sytse 11y agoI've put the user pack price at the text below the pricing so it is clear from the start https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/commit/7e6b6f873dcbe3e8900e34781651a2164d8b66b5 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/commit/7e6b6f87...