6 ms·
> of course, given his knowledge and experience, perhaps often justyfingly so, but still. Always with the half-excuses for people with technical ability/track
by throwaway999666 11y ago
> of course, given his knowledge and experience, perhaps often justyfingly so, but still.
Always with the half-excuses for people with technical ability/track record. "Well he comes off as kind of rude, buut he kind of knows what he's doing so the arrogance is maybe warranted". Just goes to show that technical ability and dealing with people even in a technical setting are two very different things. I guess that is the reward for a technical track record? Being half-excused for lording it over other people?
Disclaimer: I know nothing about Cox' online personality. I'm just addressing how people react to rude (or whatever the intent is) technical people.
- coldtea 11y ago>Always with the half-excuses for people with technical ability/track record. "Well he comes off as kind of rude, buut he kind of knows what he's doing so the arrogance is maybe warranted". Just goes to show that technical ability and dealing with people even in a technical setting are two very different things. I guess that is the reward for a technical track record? Being half-excused for lording it over other people? Well, I guess that's life. If you can do somebody else cannot do, and they need you to do it, you get to dictate the terms and be rude. Ideally we'd all like rainbows and kindness, but you know...
- throwaway999666 11y agoNo you moved the goalpost from half-justifying, to "tough shit, sometimes you just gotta deal with it". Which I agree with insofar that some things are just "the way they are", but it's a completely different argument.
- coldtea 11y agoWait, what goalpost? I wasn't making an argument initially, I was making an observation: "He's curt, maybe justifyingly so, but still...". Then I further expanded upon that, based on the comment I got, that "that's how it is, if you're good at something you often get to dictate how you treat people who want it". Wasn't meaning it to be an argument (to be met with counter arguments, to move goalposts, etc), just plain observation of how it is, as I see it, in both cases.