5 ms·
>FOSS of more often then not superior on its merits alone, why does it need a protectionist anti-competitive law to help it compete? If proprietary software is
by Malstrond 11y ago
>FOSS of more often then not superior on its merits alone, why does it need a protectionist anti-competitive law to help it compete?
If proprietary software is more often then not superior on its merits alone, why does it need a protectionist anti-competitive law (Intellectual property, reverse engineering forbidden by EULAs) to help it compete?