6 ms·
Forgive me if I'm just out of date here, but last time I checked, REE offered something like a 30% memory savings per forked worker. By my math (Workers_ree = W
by rcoder 17y ago
Forgive me if I'm just out of date here, but last time I checked, REE offered something like a 30% memory savings per forked worker. By my math (Workers_ree = Workers_mri / 0.7) that gives you something like a 1.4X increase in number of available workers.
Now, a 40% boost in running threads within the same memory is nothing to sneeze at. It's just a far cry from a 200% increase in the same metric.
Furthermore, for many deployments running on bare hardware (or even virtualized in a private datacenter), RAM isn't really the most precious resource. An modern app server can easily be packing 16-32GB of RAM, at which point CPU and I/O throughput can easily challenge memory for "most precious resource".