11 ms·

Faster and less memory intensive[1] and has a type system. [1]: http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/compare.php?lang=ghc&lang2=erlang http://benchmark

• siscia 11y ago
  Hummm... I do agree that Haskell will be faster and less memory intensive than erlang, but this benchmark is not really significant... I am not going to use erlang to write a mandelbrot...
  • dons 11y ago
    Yeah, it could well be that you just care about latency hiding on e.g. network services. For that raw compute and memory is much less important than having a reasonable thread scheduler and cheap threads.
    • siscia 11y ago
      Exactly my point :) I was wonder, how well haskel does in that area...