10 ms·
True, but in this particular case, the cost to time going (temporarily) backwards would only be connecting to a potentially-suboptimal disque node, and that wou
by ryan_sb 11y ago
True, but in this particular case, the cost to time going (temporarily) backwards would only be connecting to a potentially-suboptimal disque node, and that would be remedied after the subjective-machine-time caught up with the previous subjective time.