16 ms·
I'm a little disappointed Apple, the new MBP doesn't have a top of the line graphics card, and it's still stuck to 16GB of ram. This is hardly a pro option. I
by jdavid 11y ago
I'm a little disappointed Apple, the new MBP doesn't have a top of the line graphics card, and it's still stuck to 16GB of ram. This is hardly a pro option.
I wonder if I need a #hackentosh if I want 32GB of RAM, and an nVidia 950M or better.
- outworlder 11y agoDo you really need >16GB to be considered 'pro' these days? You can have 64GB on a MacPro. Hope that's 'pro' enough.
- nsxwolf 11y ago128GB if you use slower ram.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- chiph 11y agoI run several VMs at once on mine, and 16gb is constraining. Put me in the "the Pro is no longer so Pro" camp.
- eropple 11y agoI regularly have six to eight virtual machines in flight at any given time and never feel constrained. Are you sizing them appropriately for their tasks?