5 ms·
When I follow [1], IE8's numbers are (from Jan) 2.56%, 2.61%, 2.13%, 2.19%, 2.26%. So they don't look to have grown at all. If anything they've declined a litt
by Petefine 11y ago
When I follow [1], IE8's numbers are (from Jan) 2.56%, 2.61%, 2.13%, 2.19%, 2.26%. So they don't look to have grown at all.
If anything they've declined a little, although this may be within the margin for error for the sample.
- franciscop 11y ago2.13%, 2.19%, 2.26% is what worries me. They dropped dramatically in the same period of last year. From March, they are slowly creeping up.
- Rexxar 11y agoI think the most important part of Petefine comment is "within the margin for error the sample". I would be surprised if the margin of error was inferior to 0.13%. It's an Human bias to see patterns when there are only random events.