5 ms·
All I can say is that I am moving everything I can to cloud object storage from my Netapp because of 2 cents vs. $2 for GB of storage. Also Netapp wouldn't be m
by omerh 11y ago
All I can say is that I am moving everything I can to cloud object storage from my Netapp because of 2 cents vs. $2 for GB of storage.
Also Netapp wouldn't be my third chios on the next purchase of storage
- KaiserPro 11y agoSo what do you do when you need fast local storage?
- CyberDildonics 11y agoHe didn't say he was doing anything differently there.
- richmlpdx 11y agoWe're looking at on-prem object storage (Cloudian on commodity hardware) and public offerings (Azure, S3) and NAS gateways. Avere, Panzura, CTERA, TwinStrata. There are several options depending on your use case. With dedup and compression, we can get on-prem pricing that is very close to cloud providers with the benefit of controlling the network end-to-end for.
- omerh 11y agoRunning on premis VMWare (but sadly my Netapp isn't that fast FAS2240)
- rsync 11y ago"All I can say is that I am moving everything I can to cloud object storage from my Netapp because of 2 cents vs. $2 for GB of storage." Where are you getting 2 cents ? S3 is ~3 cents, glacier and nearline are 1 cents ... what are you buying that costs 2 cents ? (genuinely curious)
- Ecio78 11y agowhat are you doing with your storage? I don't get all this relationship between "cloud object storage" and the dawn of Netapp as stated in the storagemojo article. For me Netapp is, like said by KaiserPro, a multi-purpose system where I can do FC, iSCSI, NFS, CIFS, with HA, snapshots etc., where I can host my VMs, my Windows files, my block-access disks for Databases etc.. It's not the place were I'd just put files that I'll serve via a S3-like API interface...