5 ms·
That's pretty awesome. Implemented with: transform: scaleX(-1);
by stringham 11y ago
That's pretty awesome.
Implemented with:
transform: scaleX(-1);
- eric_h 11y agogood eye
- BinaryIdiot 11y agoThat's really clever!
- nthitz 11y agoOn my browser (Chrome, OSX), that rule was overwritten by transform: rotateY(180deg); Which does the same thing. Presumably there is a reason?
- barsonme 11y agoOn both Firefox 37.0 and 41.0.2272.101 (gnu/linux x64, 3.19 yadda, yadda...) transform: rotateY(180deg); is the cause of the change. I'm curious which browser stringham is using.
- TazeTSchnitzel 11y agoOld IE?
- stringham 11y agoI see the scaleX(-1) on ChromeOS (42.0.2311.60 beta) and Chrome for Android (41.0.2272.96)
- stringham 11y agoFor Chrome on Linux (41.0.2272.101) I'm seeing the rotateY(180deg);
- akx 11y agoI assume it forces the use of 3D composition.
- Igglyboo 11y agoChrome on OS X here as well, mine does not get overwritten and stays as transform: scaleX(-1);
- zaphar 11y agoI worked on Google's CSS infrastructure for a while and there is a lot of logic that goes into what css rules get used where. You could be seeing that due to an experiment, a particular search result or a particular Version of Chrome. Google invests a lot of work in optimizing their css on the page with a lot of very complicated logic going into the choice of what rule to display and when.