I think you presented a false comparison. You said anything we can teach a human within an hour: do you mean a fresh human that's only just been supplied with

I think you presented a false comparison. You said anything we can teach a human within an hour: do you mean a fresh human that's only just been supplied with a brain? Because you can't teach a baby anything besides basic stimulus response on that time frame, and I'm pretty sure we can get computers to do that if we rig up the stimulus response hardware in a way comparable to a newborn. What I think you actually meant, and what I think is a completely rigged test, is comparing a human with years of training and adaptive hardware modification to a computer with absolutely no training in its ability to learn a new skill or building out its knowledge base. That, of course, is a completely terrible comparison. I'll take your bet, and call it by 2050, if you're willing to compare a human with 5 years of hardware and knowledge base training and adaptation to a computer with 1 year of hardware adaption (eg, FPGA circuit reprogramming) and 1 year of knowledge base training.