5 ms·
Making R available from Excel seems a good idea to ease the transition for newbies (like R commander) but what advantages does the standalone IDE have over RStu
by jebus989 12y ago
Making R available from Excel seems a good idea to ease the transition for newbies (like R commander) but what advantages does the standalone IDE have over RStudio or the default R.app?
Edit: actually I managed to click through to find this screenshot: http://fasterstat.com/Images/Desktop/12_R_gui.png http://fasterstat.com/Images/Desktop/12_R_gui.png which looks novel (can't currently watch the video unfortunately)
- fasteRstat 12y agographical user interface for selected packages/functions, support for multiple monitors,...
- jebus989 12y agoBoth sound good, maybe you could highlight these on your landing page? The picker for RColorBrewer palettes looks particularly handy!
- fasteRstat 12y agoYes you're right. It's the plane.
- melling 12y agoTypos on page: univerties FasteR - desctop application This tools hepls or as [an] application
- jamessb 12y agoThere are several other typos which, whilst trivial, are quite jarring: http://fasterstat.com/Product http://fasterstat.com/Product produsing -> producing poverfull -> powerful http://fasterstat.com/ http://fasterstat.com/ anoher -> another There is also inconsistent use of 'Addin' and 'Add-In'.
- vkr 12y agoThe video presents version 1.4.1 (last 10 seconds of the video), the website only lists version 0.4.1. I assume you changed the version number after finishing the video? It was hard/impossible for me to read the R code in the video while playing it at 1080p.
- Blahah 12y agoA major use-case for Excel integration is in finance, where a vast number of analysts - not newbies in any meaningful sense - work in Excel. Giving them access to the power of R from within a familiar environment is a great thing. Recommendation for the developer (if you're not doing this already): market hard to finance businesses. You'll make a killing.
- baldfat 12y agoTerm newbies in R was what the poster before stated. Personally I would NOT want to have anyone use R with a spreadsheet program. 1) I want manipulated data that is clear to replicate 2) I want my output to be plots and reports not another spreadsheet
- jackmaney 12y agoAgreed. 99% of the time, I only use Excel as a CSV viewer (and it's a rather clunky and error-prone CSV viewer at that).
- Mikeb85 12y ago> 2) I want my output to be plots and reports not another spreadsheet Knitr for the win! Seriously great package (and integrated nicely into R Studio), I use it for all my reports, presentations, etc...
- peatmoss 12y agoI'm finding myself loving org-babel more and more. I also love knitr, but in comparison org-babel: - Works with just about any language you can imagine, not just R or the few other hypothetically supported languages - Allows me to write in a lightweight Markdown-comparable, LaTeX-augmentable syntax, except org-mode supports internal references. - Lets you do truly obscene things like pass values from bash, to python, to julia, to R As Emacs begins to move more and more to Guile, I hope that the org-* functionality can be instrumented as embeddable libraries. I understand that Emacs isn't for everyone, and thus I wish org-mode (the format) and org-babel were available to the rest of the world. I was surprised to find how few edge-cases aren't better handled by org-* than knitr / RMarkdown.