6 ms·

I love how this is a perfectly valid question given the context .. even if the phrasing may be somewhat off. Back to topic, I'd think boobs (and other parts of

by Padding 12y ago

I love how this is a perfectly valid question given the context .. even if the phrasing may be somewhat off. Back to topic, I'd think boobs (and other parts of the body that aren't part of the face) won't have much impact on prefrences. Would you really reject someone because of their cup size, despite their pretty face? Similary, would you accept someone just because of their cup size despite their less-than-pretty face? I mean sure there are people out there for whom this may be a valid concern, but it won't for the vast majority. So the question then really only is where you draw the line - what about asymmetric boobs and other body features?

D-Coder 12y ago
Why shouldn't cup size be important to many people? "Would you really reject someone because of their face, despite their excellent cup size? Similary, would you accept someone just because of their face despite their less-than-excellent cup size?"
- draugadrotten 12y ago
  Bad boy. The ideology du jour is left-wing feminism and HBTQ. Boob quality is a male desire, and hence is chauvinist and bad. Now, if tinder offered girls the ability to filter guys by wallet thickness and status... that would be different and totally appropriate.
  - daemonfire300 12y ago
    Depends on the angle. I would say if it comes to Tinder all you get is a picture. So the only metric is the body-form-shape-sizes etc. If the size of some body parts can be measured with the submitted images I see nothing wrong here. Wallet thinkness and status are not represented in our data (image), so it would not make sense to include those metrics, since its out of scope.
  - socksy 12y ago
    Wow, this is just a really shitty thing to say. You genuinely think it's a left-wing feminism issue? And that feminists would be perfectly happy with an app that discriminated on wallet thickness and status ...whilst also rallying against institutional created status?

by Padding 12y ago

D-Coder 12y ago

Why shouldn't cup size be important to many people? "Would you really reject someone because of their face, despite their excellent cup size? Similary, would you accept someone just because of their face despite their less-than-excellent cup size?"

draugadrotten 12y ago
Bad boy. The ideology du jour is left-wing feminism and HBTQ. Boob quality is a male desire, and hence is chauvinist and bad. Now, if tinder offered girls the ability to filter guys by wallet thickness and status... that would be different and totally appropriate.
- daemonfire300 12y ago
  Depends on the angle. I would say if it comes to Tinder all you get is a picture. So the only metric is the body-form-shape-sizes etc. If the size of some body parts can be measured with the submitted images I see nothing wrong here. Wallet thinkness and status are not represented in our data (image), so it would not make sense to include those metrics, since its out of scope.
- socksy 12y ago
  Wow, this is just a really shitty thing to say. You genuinely think it's a left-wing feminism issue? And that feminists would be perfectly happy with an app that discriminated on wallet thickness and status ...whilst also rallying against institutional created status?