I've come up with a better compression scheme than yours. My scheme is exactly the same as yours, but you replace the first three bytes with one byte instead o

I've come up with a better compression scheme than yours. My scheme is exactly the same as yours, but you replace the first three bytes with one byte instead of two. Doesn't matter what byte you replace them with, because - just like your scheme - you can't get the original data back by decompressing it anyway.