5 ms·
It would be useful for both purposes, wouldn't it?
by slackson 12y ago
It would be useful for both purposes, wouldn't it?
- stormbrew 12y agoSince they mention a false-negative in the article, it doesn't seem like it would be a good choice to rely exclusively on it. If it gave false negatives at a very low rate, though, a high rate of false positives wouldn't make it useless.