> Yeah. Its a turd. I bet that would've been a valid verdict for the first search engine way back then too, compared to all the neatly organized catalogs. Or t

> Yeah. Its a turd. I bet that would've been a valid verdict for the first search engine way back then too, compared to all the neatly organized catalogs. Or the first android compared to the iphone. Personally I'm still amazed that something like Glass is not only possible but can fit in a $1500 budget. > $1500 . For "Google Quality". Establishing that pricepoint is a monumental achievement by my account. It's well withing the grasp of us mere mortals and the way hardware prices tend to evolve will fit comfortably in any "why not try it" budget within just a few short years. Novelty stuff like this usually costs one or two orders of magnitude more..