6 ms·
Ideally, it would be a completely automated system. You don't need to understand machine learning to know that it would be better for the computer to do everyth
by mostly_harmless 12y ago
Ideally, it would be a completely automated system. You don't need to understand machine learning to know that it would be better for the computer to do everything itself without human intervention
- dtjones 12y agoIt is completely automated. It automatically incorporates human/user feedback into ranking.
- unknownian 12y agoEven the startingly accurate Chrome predictions?
- DannyBee 12y agoyes
- DannyBee 12y ago?? It doesn't require human intervention. Simplified: Machine learning algorithm constructs page to show human. Humans click on this or that on page. Click data is fed into algorithm. Algorithm uses this data decide how to show better page to humans You are taking human input. It is still completely automated, it requires no human intervention.
- CHY872 12y agoHow so? If the cost of making the computer able to do everything itself is greater than the cost of an equivalent system that takes human input, then you should use the human input version every time.
- diminoten 12y agoMonetary cost isn't the only cost.
- diminoten 12y agoMonetary cost isn't the only cost. Also, humans are prone to error and many other inefficiencies. They get sick, quit, fluctuate in performance, require attention and care... you say "cost" like it's some easily calculable number, but it's a whole boatload of intangibles that just... disappear if the computer does it.