5 ms·

I find these terms strange. I have to pay for the high resolution and SVG but still have to check for right violations. For a payment of 5$ (compare stock photo

• new299 12y ago
  I couldn't see a purchase option was it present? I had the feeling it was in the terms in case he decided to do it later. The image element resource licenses are listed in the Resources section. Most of them appear to be relatively permissive licenses though some require attribution. I get the impression it's a nice little side project, and mostly for fun. I guess he didn't what to go to the expense of purchasing licensing rights for stock images or searching out high quality resources which are in the public domain.
• icebraining 12y ago
  A different from a picture, since it may have been trademarked. At least in theory, a picture is free from copyright violation claims if it's been taken independently, but a trademark may be violated even if the logo was independently generated. At least, that's my understanding of the relevant law (IANAL).
• briandear 12y ago
  If you pay to use Illustrator, that doesn't automatically ensure that anything you create using Illustrator doesn't infringe on another's trademark. Stock photos are different because they are generally rights cleared (depending on the license you purchase.) This isn't a stock logo repository, this is a construction kit.
• shutupalready 12y ago
  He's obviously concerned about being sued by, for example, McDonald's because you made and used a logo having golden arches in the shape of an "M" with on a red background with text "McDonald's" at the bottom. There's no way he can detect or prevent every such possibility.