6 ms·
Please don't start a witch hunt on the basis of a handful internet comments. We should be better than that.
by MortenK 12y ago
Please don't start a witch hunt on the basis of a handful internet comments. We should be better than that.
- santacluster 12y agoNot necessary, because this person and her views are quite well known: http://firstround.com/article/The-woman-behind-the-Netflix-Culture-doc http://firstround.com/article/The-woman-behind-the-Netflix-C... What's basically clear is that the candidates complaining here a) didn't do their basic f-ing homework, and b) are seriously misrepresenting Netflix views on letting people go. Not I agree with that part of Netflix culture (and it would pretty much be illegal in most Western countries), but there is a clear logic behind it, and I seriously doubt they skipped that part in the interview.
- icebraining 12y agoWhat's basically clear is that the candidates complaining here (...) are seriously misrepresenting Netflix views on letting people go. You can assume the posters here are being malicious, or that they're honestly telling what they understood from the interview. If the latter, then I'd argue it's Netflix fault for failing to leave the right impression.
- revelation 12y agoHow is it a witch hunt? Labor is supposed to be a market, no?
- snowwrestler 12y agoNaming the person opens them up to personal harassment (which happens way more than people think). Potential employees don't need to know her name to make an informed decision about whether or not apply to Netflix.
- hueving 12y agoThey can make an informed decision about whether to bother showing up to the interview if they find themselves scheduled with her.