5 ms·
Definitely not, it's 2 years old and memtest86+, prime95, iozone and iperf for 24 hours each. These are all independent soft errors. Furthermore, I'm continua
by rab_oof 12y ago
Definitely not, it's 2 years old and memtest86+, prime95, iozone and iperf for 24 hours each. These are all independent soft errors. Furthermore, I'm continually running stuff that is doing gpg signing/verification and sha256 checksums in VMs... They would fail. Also, there would be kernel panics... I've had zero.
- App Store likely has a problem with storeaccountd / installer framework from the exception traces I've seen (debug menu on).
- HFS+ can corrupt itself irreparably (it's not ZFS). BTDTBTTS.
- Flow 12y agoI see. Do you use VirtualBox for virtualization? I read that the kernel modules for VirtualBox were of dubious quality. http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTk5Mw http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTk5Mw
- 72deluxe 12y agoThe HFS+ problems would not be related to VirtualBox. VirtualBox gets a bad press from the Linux kernel mods too. Apple introduced a new virtualisation framework in Yosemite, hence the rereleases of the most widely used virtualization items (Parallels and Fusion).
- rab_oof 12y agoSounds post hoc. The virtualization products tend to be on regular, frequent release cycles. (I know one of the Fusion product manager.)
- rab_oof 12y agoHell no. Vmware.