5 ms·

I assume he means generics.

• to3m 12y ago
  Maybe... :) I was a little circumspect because the usual response to any suggestion that a lack of generics might be some kind of problem is - generally - not positive. But my point is merely that C# has this thing, and Go doesn't. If I knew enough about Go to say instead that it lacks something else that C# has, I'd have done that...