7 ms·
I'll try, imagine a road like this: http://lh6.ggpht.com/_gt_enTZIj1g/TMq0zFITxUI/AAAAAAAADo8/Rb7HaW7Yb6Q/s912/IMG_1388.jpg http://lh6.ggpht.com/_gt_enTZIj1g/T
by codfrantic 12y ago
I'll try,
imagine a road like this: http://lh6.ggpht.com/_gt_enTZIj1g/TMq0zFITxUI/AAAAAAAADo8/Rb7HaW7Yb6Q/s912/IMG_1388.jpg http://lh6.ggpht.com/_gt_enTZIj1g/TMq0zFITxUI/AAAAAAAADo8/Rb...
(not sweden but Netherlands but it works for the example.)
Overtaking is not allowed (except for farm traffic), in a 2+1 situation there would be three lanes all the time, alternating between directions. This means that there will always be a legal spot to overtake within a few minutes. (usually the climbing direction would be two lanes so you can overtake slow trucks e.d.) Therefore you don't have to overtake a slow driver by using the oncoming lane.
By a 'standard 3-lane highway', I assume you mean three lanes each way, these roads have nowhere near enough traffic on them to explain all that extra tarmac.
- pc86 12y agoYes that is what I meant, the main highway I drive to work on is 3 lanes each direction. Bumper to bumper < 40 MPH (65 KPH) in rush hour, sporadic traffic going 75-85+ MPH (135+ KPH) at other times. We have a few of these roads in my area but not very many, and you can easily go many many miles on a road similar to the one in your picture with no passing lane.