5 ms·

Clearly the author has never heard of ClojureScript's Om.

• hackerboos 12y ago
  How does Om not suffer from the same problems? It's just an Clojurescript interface to React.
  • coding4all 12y ago
    https://gist.github.com/runexec/6efb322f29fc790a98a1 https://gist.github.com/runexec/6efb322f29fc790a98a1
  • jeremiep 12y ago
    Om is not an interface to React but rather React is the backend to Om. I wouldn't use React out of the box, for pretty much the very same reasons outlined in the slides.
    • hackerboos 12y ago
      Quoting the github README: Om: A ClojureScript interface to Facebook's React.
• Gonzih 12y ago
  I would suggest Reagent as a good example of simple API on to p of React
  • coding4all 12y ago
    Easier to learn doesn't quite mean "simple". I prefer Om not just because I took the time to learn it, but because it makes more sense once you do.
    • Gonzih 12y ago
      Can you explain? I don't see lot of sense in om's complexity personally, but maybe I'm wrong.