Agreed. This article starts with a hypothesis ("Marissa Mayer bad!"), and then lays out cherry-picked 'facts' and anecdotes around it. It could as easily have

Agreed. This article starts with a hypothesis ("Marissa Mayer bad!"), and then lays out cherry-picked 'facts' and anecdotes around it. It could as easily have started with "Marissa Mayer great!", and done the same (but with a different set of 'facts' and anecdotes).