4 ms·

For that to follow, you'd have to show that a significant proportion of the suicides by firearm by stateside service members involved government firearms. I sin

For that to follow, you'd have to show that a significant proportion of the suicides by firearm by stateside service members involved government firearms. I sincerely doubt that's the case.

Retra 12y ago
For what to follow?
- commandar 12y ago
  The premise that access to duty firearms is a driving factor being logically followed by higher suicide rates among service members. If the suicides aren't being committed with duty weapons, then there isn't really a logical link there.