5 ms·
I would say even the food safety analogy is appropriate. Sure, food safety is important; that doesn't mean you have to spend hundreds of millions of pounds in "
by phySi0 12y ago
I would say even the food safety analogy is appropriate. Sure, food safety is important; that doesn't mean you have to spend hundreds of millions of pounds in "food safety researchers" who will conduct rigorous scientific experiments to find out the best ways to limit the spread of germs and implement them, an in-house doctor with medical supplies who will treat customers that get food poisoning, etc.
It just means there's a minimum, a bar, that they shouldn't go below. Everyone has a different bar, but most people generally agree on things like don't pick up food off the floor, don't leave things open or out, put things in the right places, make sure you wash your hands, etc. (I am not a food safety expert).
Of course, for a startup, it depends on the product or service they're offering. A startup payment processor should be very security conscious, as the stakes are high. A movie logger should have the bare minimum that all startups should have, i.e. strong encryption, basic security protocols, etc.
- atmosx 12y ago> I would say even the food safety analogy is appropriate. I think it's NOT appropriate. Of course, in the end, it's a matter of value: Do you value your health equally with your digital privacy, your money, etc.? If 'yes' then the analogy yes, if 'no' then it doesn't. I don't so, to me, it doesn't.
- TillE 12y agoAnalogies are not meant to be precisely equivalent in every respect. They're just a tool to illustrate a certain point.
- benmcnelly 12y agoOh so like, Analogies are like butterflies! Not everyone understands them, and sometimes people who do still miss the point of them.
- ethbro 12y agoAnalogies are exactly like butterflies. Someone uses one once, and it causes a hurricane in a different comment thread. ;)